Re: [PATCH 07/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd_departed() take a struct pointer.

[Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@atmel.com>]

On 13/08/13 18:35, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 08/13/2013 09:29 PM, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
>
>> oz_hcd_pd_departed() takes struct oz_port pointer instead of
>> void *, change function declaration to avoid ambiguity.
>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c |    4 ++--
>>   drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.h |    2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c 
>> b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>> index 73d80f2..ed3ffeb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>> @@ -720,9 +720,9 @@ out:
>>    * polled. We release the reference we hold on the PD.
>>    * Context: softirq
>>    */
>> -void oz_hcd_pd_departed(void *hport)
>> +void oz_hcd_pd_departed(struct oz_port *hport)
>>   {
>> -    struct oz_port *port = (struct oz_port *)hport;
>> +    struct oz_port *port = hport;
>
>    Do you really need a copy? Isn't it better to rename the parameter 
> and remove this line altogether?
>
> WBR, Sergei
>

Yes, that is the idea,  for next patch series, as I don't want to mix 
two changes in single patch.

-- 
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare