public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@atmel.com>
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd_departed() take a struct pointer.
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:46:36 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520A70FC.6080003@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A6F75.8010308@atmel.com>

On 08/13/2013 09:40 PM, Rupesh Gujare wrote:

>>> oz_hcd_pd_departed() takes struct oz_port pointer instead of
>>> void *, change function declaration to avoid ambiguity.

>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c |    4 ++--
>>>   drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.h |    2 +-
>>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>>> index 73d80f2..ed3ffeb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>>> @@ -720,9 +720,9 @@ out:
>>>    * polled. We release the reference we hold on the PD.
>>>    * Context: softirq
>>>    */
>>> -void oz_hcd_pd_departed(void *hport)
>>> +void oz_hcd_pd_departed(struct oz_port *hport)
>>>   {
>>> -    struct oz_port *port = (struct oz_port *)hport;
>>> +    struct oz_port *port = hport;

>>    Do you really need a copy? Isn't it better to rename the parameter and
>> remove this line altogether?

>> WBR, Sergei

> Yes, that is the idea,  for next patch series, as I don't want to mix two
> changes in single patch.

    Don't think it's worth another series.

WBR, Sergei


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-13 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-13 17:29 [PATCH 05/10] staging: ozwpan: Remove unnecessary pointer check Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd_arrived() return a struct pointer Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd_departed() take " Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 17:35   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-13 17:40     ` Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 17:46       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-08-14 21:31         ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH 08/10] staging: ozwpan: Remove unneeded initializers Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] staging: ozwpan: Swap arguments of oz_ep_alloc() to match kmalloc() Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 17:35   ` Joe Perches
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] staging: ozwpan: Separate success & failure case for oz_hcd_pd_arrived() Rupesh Gujare
2013-08-13 23:00   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520A70FC.6080003@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rupesh.gujare@atmel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox