public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: default CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:30:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520A7B48.3020304@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52050D03.4030805@zytor.com>

On 08/09/2013 08:38 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 08:32 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 08:23 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> I would like to change the defaults for CONFIG_EFI and CONFIG_EFI_STUB
>>> to y.  There is little reason to omit this since EFI now is a
>>> significant percentage of all systems.
>>
>> You didn't actually attach the patch, but I presume this is for 64 bit
>> compiles on x86 only?  We still have significant problems getting 64 bit
>> EFI to interact with 32 bit kernels, so I don't believe we should enable
>> CONFIG_EFI globally for all of x86.
>>
> 
> Well, it doesn't *solve* the problem with cross-mode, but it should work
> as-is for EFI32->32-bit kernel and EFI64->64-bit kernel.  For the
> cross-mode kernels they will simply not do anything.
> 
> Either way, nothing bad should come from it.  The worst thing that will
> happen is that the kernel says "I don't have any EFI that I recognize."
> 
> Cross-mode support will always require a secondary bootloader (since as
> far as I know there is no concept of "fat binaries" for EFI), but Matt
> Fleming is working on genuine cross-mode support for both the boot stub
> and (eventually) run time support.
> 

James, does this address your concerns?

	-hpa



  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-13 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-09 15:23 RFC: default CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-09 15:32 ` James Bottomley
2013-08-09 15:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 18:30     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-08-13 18:43       ` James Bottomley
2013-08-13 18:52         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 19:02           ` James Bottomley
2013-08-13 19:06             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-15  5:15         ` Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520A7B48.3020304@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox