From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: default CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:52:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520A8054.1030108@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376419410.3467.67.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
On 08/13/2013 11:43 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> James, does this address your concerns?
>
> You mean for globally enabling CONFIG_EFI on x86? not really for 32
> bit, you say above it's pretty much unusable; I'd prefer just to enable
> it for 64 bit. As you said in your original post "since EFI now is a
> significant percentage of all systems" but you actually mean EFI64 ...
> EFI32 is a pretty insignificant percentage of all systems.
For better or worse, there will be more.
> Can we actually boot a 32 bit kernel on an EFI64 system? The last time
> I tried on my Secure Boot SDV it wouldn't work; the problem is getting
> someting in the transfer of control path to boot the processor back to
> 32 bit mode.
We can boot with a bootloader in "skip stub" mode; no runtime services
yet. We are working on making it possible to boot via a EFI stub in
assisted mode (still needing a bootloader, but with the boot stub in the
kernel.)
Runtime services will be the last piece, obviously, but even that looks
reasonably doable.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-13 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-09 15:23 RFC: default CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-09 15:32 ` James Bottomley
2013-08-09 15:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 18:43 ` James Bottomley
2013-08-13 18:52 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-08-13 19:02 ` James Bottomley
2013-08-13 19:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-15 5:15 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520A8054.1030108@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox