From: Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com>
To: Jingbai Ma <jingbai.ma@hp.com>
Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, "Mitchell,
Lisa (MCLinux in Fort Collins)" <lisa.mitchell@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [Help Test] kdump, x86, acpi: Reproduce CPU0 SMI corruption issue after unsetting BSP flag
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:13:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520B4A22.2030800@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A10A3.5080303@hp.com>
On 08/13/2013 06:55 PM, Jingbai Ma wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 05:19 PM, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've addressing kdump restriction that there's only one cpu available
>> on the kdump 2nd kernel. Now I need to check if the following CPU0 SMI
>> corruption issue fixed in the following commit can again be reproduced
>> by unsetting BSP flag of the boot cpu:
>>
>> commit 74b5820808215f65b70b05a099d6d3c969b82689
>> Author: Bjorn Helgaas<bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
>> Date: Wed Jul 29 15:54:25 2009 -0600
>>
>> ACPI: bind workqueues to CPU 0 to avoid SMI corruption
>>
>> On some machines, a software-initiated SMI causes corruption unless the
>> SMI runs on CPU 0. An SMI can be initiated by any AML, but typically it's
>> done in GPE-related methods that are run via workqueues, so we can avoid
>> the known corruption cases by binding the workqueues to CPU 0.
>>
>> References:
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13751
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157171
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157691
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas<bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Len Brown<len.brown@intel.com>
>>
>> The reason is that in the current situation, I have two ideas to deal
>> with the avove kdump restriction:
>>
>> 1) Disable BSP at the 2nd kernel, posted at:
>> [PATCH v1 0/2] x86, apic: Disable BSP if boot cpu is AP
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/15
>>
>> 2) Unset BSP flag at the 1st kernel, suggested by Eric Biederman
>> during the discussion of the idea 1).
>>
>> On the idea 1), BSP is disabled on the kdump 2nd kernel. My conclusion
>> is that we have no method to reset BSP, i.e. recover BPS's healthy
>> state, while we can recover AP by means of INIT as described in MP
>> specification.
>>
>> The idea 2) is simpler. We unset BSP flag of the boot cpu at 1st
>> kernel. The behaviour when receiving INIT depends on whether or not
>> BSP flag is set or not on its MSR; we can set and unset BSP flag of
>> MSR freely at runtime. (I don't mean we should).
>>
>> So, next thing I should do is to evalute risk of the idea 2). In fact,
>> during the discussion of the idea 1), HPA pointed out that some kind
>> of firmware affects if BSP flag is unset. Also, maybe from the same
>> reason, recently introduced cpu0 hot-plugging feature by Fenghua Yu
>> doesn't appear to unset BSP flag.
>>
>> The biggest problem next is that I don't have any machines reported in
>> the bugzilla articles; this issue inherently depends on firmware.
>>
>> So, could anyone help testing the idea 2) above if you have which of
>> the following machines? (or other ones that can lead to the same bug)
>>
>> - HP Compaq 6910p
>> - HP Compaq 6710b
>> - HP Compaq 6710s
>> - HP Compaq 6510b
>> - HP Compaq 2510p
>>
>> I prepared a small programs for this test. See the attached file.
>> The steps to try to reproduce the bug is as follows:
>>
>> 1. $ tar xf bsp_flag_modules.tar.gz; cd bsp_flag_modules
>> 2. $ make # to build these programs
>> 3. $ insmod unsetbspflag.ko # to unset BSP flag of the boot cpu
>> 4. $ insmod getcpuinfo.ko # to confirm if BSP flag of the boot cpu has
>> # been unset.
>> $ dmesg | tail
>> 5. Close the lid of the machine.
>> 6. Wait some minutes if necessary.
>> 7. Open the lid and you can see oops on the screen if bug has
>> successfully been reproduced.
>>
>
> I couldn't find any model list above, but found one HP EliteBook 6930p.
> I tested this machine with kernel 2.6.30 first. After resuming from
> suspend, system hang.
>
> Then, I tested with kernel 3.11.0-rc5, it worked well, could resume from
> suspend without any problem.
>
> Next, I tested your program to clear BSP flag, I found the
> unsetbspflag.ko didn't work everytime, sometimes I have to execute
> insmod/rmmod several times to clear the BSP flag. (I used your
> getcpuinfo.ko to check the BSP flag)
>
> cpu: 0 bios_apic: 0 apic: 0 AP
> cpu: 1 bios_apic: 1 apic: 1 AP
>
> I suspended it, and them resumed it. This machine resumed from suspend
> successfully, but the BSP flag has been set back:
>
> cpu: 0 bios_apic: 0 apic: 0 BSP
> cpu: 1 bios_apic: 1 apic: 1 AP
>
> That's all my observation. Hope it's helpful.
>
I found a side effect of unsetting BSP flag.
It affected system rebooting, once the BSP flags been removed, and issue
reboot command, system will hang after message:
Restarting system.
And have to do a hardware reset to recover it.
I have reproduced this problem on the following systems:
HP EliteBook 6930p
HP Compaq DC7700
HP ProLiant DL980 (4 sockets, 40 cores)
I have an idea: To avoid such kind of issue, we can unset BSP flag in
the first kernel during crash processing, and restore it in the second
kernel in the APs initializing.
--
Thanks,
Jingbai Ma
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 9:19 [Help Test] kdump, x86, acpi: Reproduce CPU0 SMI corruption issue after unsetting BSP flag HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-06 16:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-07 10:05 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-13 10:55 ` Jingbai Ma
2013-08-14 9:13 ` Jingbai Ma [this message]
2013-08-14 19:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-19 2:29 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19 2:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-19 9:13 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19 13:46 ` Petr Tesarik
2013-08-20 3:13 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-08-19 1:57 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520B4A22.2030800@hp.com \
--to=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).