From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>
To: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, a-kishore@ti.com, afzal@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm: dts: AM43x: Add usb DT nodes for AM4372
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:34:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520B958B.1000900@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520B9144.5000701@ti.com>
+ Roger
Hi George,
Yes, I had some comment about the "ti'type" in Roger's series that will
be applicable here as well.
On 14/08/2013 16:16, George Cherian wrote:
> +Benoit
> If you dont have any comments, can you take this for 3.12?
>
> Regards
> -George
>
> On 7/10/2013 1:44 PM, George Cherian wrote:
>
>> This patch adds
>> - HS USB nodes
>> - phy nodes
>> - usb control module nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
>> ---
>>
>> changes from v2
>> change synopsis to snps
>> use simple node names
>> add both USB and PHY instances
>> add usbctrl node
>>
>> changes from v1
>> renamed synopsis to snps
>> removed flag tx-fifo-resize
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi | 58
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
>> index ddc1df7..37f196f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am4372.dtsi
>> @@ -64,5 +64,63 @@
>> compatible = "ti,am4372-counter32k","ti,omap-counter32k";
>> reg = <0x44e86000 0x40>;
>> };
>> +
>> + phy1: usbphy1 {
>> + compatible = "ti,am4372-usb2";
That's not a very good name for a phy? It looks like a usb module.
The bindings specify only ti,omap-usb2 or ti,omap-usb3 for USB2 or USB3.
I guess it should be one of them and potentially the binding should be
updated with ti,omap-usb2-phy and ti,omap-usb3-phy names while we can
still do it.
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + id = <0>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + phy2: usbphy2 {
Why do you need a different node name here? It should be a generic name
to identify the function, so usbphy or usb-phy seems good enough.
>> + compatible = "ti,am4372-usb2";
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + id = <1>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + usbctrl: omap-control-usb@44e10620 {
>> + compatible = "ti,omap-control-usb";
>> + reg = <0x44e10620 0x10>;
>> + reg-names = "control_dev_conf";
>> + ti,type = <3>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + usb1: am4372_dwc3@48380000 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + compatible = "ti,am4372-dwc3";
>> + reg = <0x48380000 0x200>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 172 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + utmi-mode = <1>;
>> + ranges;
A blank line here will be nice.
>> + dwc3@48390000 {
>> + compatible = "snps,dwc3";
>> + reg = <0x48390000 0xd000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + phys = <&phy1>;
>> + phy-names = "am4372-usb1";
What is the purpose of the phy-names? Is it relevant to add the SoC name
in something that usually, at least for the clocks and IRQs, is IP specific?
The current documentation does not explain it and does not support phys
property either.
synopsys DWC3 CORE
DWC3- USB3 CONTROLLER
Required properties:
- compatible: must be "synopsys,dwc3"
- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device
- interrupts: Interrupts used by the dwc3 controller.
- usb-phy : array of phandle for the PHY device
Is there some binding update ongoing for 3.12?
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + usb2: am4372_dwc3@483c0000 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + compatible = "ti,am4372-dwc3";
>> + reg = <0x483c0000 0x200>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 178 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + utmi-mode = <1>;
>> + ranges;
A blank line here will be nice.
>> + dwc3@483d0000 {
>> + compatible = "snps,dwc3";
>> + reg = <0x483d0000 0xd000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 174 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + phys = <&phy2>;
>> + phy-names = "am4372-usb2";
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>
>
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 8:14 [PATCH v3] arm: dts: AM43x: Add usb DT nodes for AM4372 George Cherian
2013-08-14 14:16 ` George Cherian
2013-08-14 14:34 ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2013-08-16 3:19 ` George Cherian
2013-08-16 9:08 ` Benoit Cousson
2013-08-16 10:21 ` George Cherian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520B958B.1000900@baylibre.com \
--to=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=a-kishore@ti.com \
--cc=afzal@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=george.cherian@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox