From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752078Ab3HTRkb (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:40:31 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:36591 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385Ab3HTRk3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:40:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,921,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="365698986" Message-ID: <5213ABB9.5060600@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:47:37 -0700 From: Srinivas Pandruvada User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Subject: kobject_uevent call in device_add Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there any specific reason that "kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD) is called before calling "class_intf->add_dev(dev, class_intf) in the function device_add()? I am wondering if we call after class_intf->add_dev, it will provide opportunity for client drivers to do some operation before user space is notified. Thanks, Srinivas