From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: bsingharora@gmail.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/delayacct.c: check NULL for member variable 'delays' in all extern functions.
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:17:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521574A5.30308@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130821151025.77673f0f3cad748a80086a16@linux-foundation.org>
On 08/22/2013 06:10 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:40:03 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>
>> The member variable 'delays' may be NULL, so need check NULL before use
>> it for all extern functions, just like __delayacct_tsk_init() and
>> __delayacct_add_tsk() have already done.
>
> If task.delays is NULL, the kernel will oops. I don't recall seeing
> such oops reports hence I suspect that you missed some check somewhere.
>
> For example, delayacct_blkio_start() checks current->delays before
> calling __delayacct_blkio_start(), so why retest current->delays in
> __delayacct_blkio_start()?
>
>
Hmm... Can we assume "__*" extern function is treated as "should not be
used by outside" ?
If so, the original implementation have done (check NULL before use it
for all extern functions), just like your valuable example, thanks.
Hmm... and better to remove the useless code in __delayacct_add_tsk(),
which the related wrapper function has done, the diff is below:
------------------------------diff begin--------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/delayacct.c b/kernel/delayacct.c
index d473988..da8b153 100644
--- a/kernel/delayacct.c
+++ b/kernel/delayacct.c
@@ -108,12 +108,6 @@ int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
struct timespec ts;
cputime_t utime, stime, stimescaled, utimescaled;
- /* Though tsk->delays accessed later, early exit avoids
- * unnecessary returning of other data
- */
- if (!tsk->delays)
- goto done;
-
tmp = (s64)d->cpu_run_real_total;
task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
cputime_to_timespec(utime + stime, &ts);
------------------------------diff end----------------------------------
If this diff is OK, I will send related patch for it.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-20 2:40 [PATCH] kernel/delayacct.c: check NULL for member variable 'delays' in all extern functions Chen Gang
2013-08-20 2:44 ` [PATCH] kernel/taskstats.c: add nla_nest_cancel() for failure processing between nla_nest_start() and nla_nest_end() Chen Gang
2013-09-03 5:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-21 22:10 ` [PATCH] kernel/delayacct.c: check NULL for member variable 'delays' in all extern functions Andrew Morton
2013-08-22 2:17 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-09-03 5:03 ` [PATCH] kernel/delayacct.c: remove redundancy checking in __delayacct_add_tsk() Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521574A5.30308@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox