From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/padata.c: always check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu()
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:27:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5215A134.90607@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130822051122.GB26773@secunet.com>
On 08/22/2013 01:11 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:44:31AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> If this patch is correct, better to let CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED
>> share the same code.
>>
>> And do we need a comment "/* fall through */" between CPU_UP_CANCELED
>> and CPU_DOWN_FAILED (or it is another bug, need a 'break' statement) ?
>>
>> At last, also better to let CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED share
>> the same code (if need a 'break'), or share the most of code (if "fall
>> through").
>>
>
> CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED can share the code. Same is true for
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Thank you too.
And need I send another patch for it ?
Or just make by yourself (and better to mark me as Reported-by). :-)
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-20 3:43 [PATCH] kernel/padata.c: always check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu() Chen Gang
2013-08-20 3:44 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-22 5:11 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-08-22 5:27 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-08-22 6:05 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-08-22 6:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-22 6:43 ` [PATCH v2] kernel/padata.c: share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED Chen Gang
2013-08-23 3:46 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-23 10:44 ` Steffen Klassert
2013-08-23 10:47 ` Herbert Xu
2013-08-26 1:11 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-29 4:42 ` Herbert Xu
2013-08-29 5:22 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5215A134.90607@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox