public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Richard Zhao <rizhao@nvidia.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"vinod.koul@intel.com" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	"djbw@fb.com" <djbw@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMA: let filter functions of of_dma_simple_xlate possible check of_node
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:18:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52167213.6090604@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130822051904.GA2685@rizhao-lap>

On 08/21/2013 11:19 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 10:00:00AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
>> pass of_phandle_args dma_spec to dma_request_channel in of_dma_simple_xlate,
>> so the filter function could access of_node in of_phandle_args.
>>
>> It also remove restriction of #dma-cells has to be one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <rizhao@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/edma.c     |  7 +++++--
>>  drivers/dma/of-dma.c   | 10 ++++------
>>  drivers/dma/omap-dma.c |  6 ++++--
>>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Can you please pick up this change?
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Can you please give a ack or reviewed-by etc?

Hmm. Looking at the patch, I'm not sure it's right.

This patch simply passes all the specfier args to the filter function,
and the code to check the equality of the of_node to the filter args is
still duplicated in each DMA driver. Instead, the DMA core should be
implementing the equality check, and only even calling the
driver-specific filter function for devices where the client's phandle
matches the DMA providing device's of_node handle.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-02  2:00 [PATCH] DMA: let filter functions of of_dma_simple_xlate possible check of_node Richard Zhao
2013-08-02 12:06 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-02 20:52   ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-22  5:19 ` Richard Zhao
2013-08-22 20:18   ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-08-23  1:29     ` Richard Zhao
2013-08-23 15:57       ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-26 12:17         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-08-26 12:55           ` Richard Zhao
2013-08-26 13:18             ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-08-26 14:10               ` Vinod Koul
2013-08-26 18:15                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-08-28  5:37                   ` Vinod Koul
2013-08-26 14:49         ` Richard Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52167213.6090604@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=djbw@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rizhao@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox