From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754779Ab3HWHq7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:46:59 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:54868 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754725Ab3HWHq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:46:57 -0400 Message-ID: <52171367.90005@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:46:47 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: LKML , Cgroups , Containers Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] cpuset: separate configured masks and efffective masks References: <52148F52.0@huawei.com> <52148FCA.8010704@huawei.com> <20130821140846.GH19286@mtj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130821140846.GH19286@mtj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.68.215] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2013/8/21 22:08, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:00:42PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >> @@ -2261,7 +2271,8 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work) >> /* synchronize mems_allowed to N_MEMORY */ >> if (mems_updated) { >> mutex_lock(&callback_mutex); >> - top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems; >> + if (!sane) >> + top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems; > > Can you please further explain how the top cgroup behaves? > top_cpuset.cpus_allowed will always be cpu_active_mask if sane_behavior is not set, otherwise it will always be cpu_possible_mask. While top_cpuset.effective_cpus will always be cpu_active_mask in either case.