From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755368Ab3HWL3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:29:13 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:58945 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754110Ab3HWL3L (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:29:11 -0400 Message-ID: <52174755.8030506@ti.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:58:21 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid* References: <1377160283-26934-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <5216798E.8070900@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <5216798E.8070900@wwwdotorg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Friday 23 August 2013 02:20 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/22/2013 02:31 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >> types for backward compatibility. > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt > >> PALMAS USB COMPARATOR >> Required Properties: >> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb" >> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid". "ti,twl6035-usb" and >> + "ti,palmas-usb" is deprecated and is kept for backward compatibility. > > So this defines one new value and deprecates the two old values. yeah. > > Why isn't a new "ti,twl6035-usb-vid" entry useful? Don't you still need yeah, it should be added too. > SoC-specific compatible values so the driver can enable any SoC-specific > bug-fixes/workarounds later if needed? hmm.. Palmas is external to SoC. So not sure if adding SoC specific compatible values is such a good idea. Thanks Kishon