Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI/DPC: Request DPC only if also requesting AER

Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-26T15:18:07Z

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:46:07AM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>
> On 2/22/24 2:15 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > When booting with "pci=noaer", we don't request control of AER, but we
> > previously *did* request control of DPC, as in the dmesg log attached at
> > the bugzilla below:
> >
> > Command line: ... pci=noaer
> > acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI EDR HPX-Type3]
> > acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug SHPCHotplug PME PCIeCapability LTR DPC]
> >
> > That's illegal per PCI Firmware Spec, r3.3, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5, which
> > says:
> >
> > If the operating system sets this bit [OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL], it
> > must also set bit 7 of the Support field (indicating support for Error
> > Disconnect Recover notifications) and bits 3 and 4 of the Control field
> > (requesting control of PCI Express Advanced Error Reporting and the PCI
> > Express Capability Structure).
>
> IIUC, this dependency is discussed in sec 4.5.2.4. "Dependencies
> Between _OSC Control Bits".
>
> Because handling of Downstream Port Containment has a dependency on
> Advanced Error Reporting, the operating system is required to
> request control over Advanced Error Reporting (bit 3 of the Control
> field) while requesting control over Downstream Port Containment
> Configuration (bit 7 of the Control field). If the operating system
> attempts to claim control of Downstream Port Containment
> Configuration without also claiming control over Advanced Error
> Reporting, firmware is required to refuse control of the feature
> being illegally claimed and mask the corresponding bit. Firmware is
> required to maintain ownership of Advanced Error Reporting if it
> retains ownership of Downstream Port Containment Configuration. If
> the operating system sets bit 7 of the Control field, it must set
> bit 7 of the Support field, indicating support for the Error
> Disconnect Recover event.

So I guess you're suggesting that there are two defects here?

1) Linux requested DPC control without requesting AER control.

2) Platform granted DPC control when it shouldn't have.

I do agree with that, but obviously we can only fix 1) in Linux.

> > Request DPC control only if we have also requested AER control.
> >
> > Fixes: ac1c8e35a326 ("PCI/DPC: Add Error Disconnect Recover (EDR) support")
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218491#c12
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
> > Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Matthew W Carlis <mattc@purestorage.com>
> > Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> > ---
> Code wise it looks fine to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index 58b89b8d950e..efc292b6214e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -518,17 +518,19 @@ static u32 calculate_control(void)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
> > control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> >
> > - if (pci_aer_available())
> > + if (pci_aer_available()) {
> > control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
> > - * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
> > - * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
> > - * and EDR.
> > - */
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> > - control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
> > + /*
> > + * Per PCI Firmware Spec, r3.3, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5, the
> > + * OS can request DPC control only if it has advertised
> > + * OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT and requested both
> > + * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL and
> > + * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL.
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC))
> > + control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
> > + }
> >
> > return control;
> > }
>
> --
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Linux Kernel Developer
>