public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin MOKREJŠ" <mmokrejs@gmail.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.10.9: kmemleak disables all CPUs except CPU0
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:27:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5225E3DB.5070507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130902160908.GE13871@arm.com>



Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 04:51:17PM +0100, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
>> Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 04:44:52PM +0100, Max Filippov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 31 August 2013 14:35, Martin MOKREJŠ <mmokrejs@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>   never realized that my CPUs are gone if I compile into kernel kmemleak.
>>>>>> Is that really the aim?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CONFIG_HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
>>>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
>>>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE=400
>>>>>> # CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST is not set
>>>>>> # CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_DEFAULT_OFF is not set
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.  Why isn't there /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online file?
>>>>>> Does not matter if it contains 0 or 1. It just should exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't really see how kmemleak would do this, maybe other config
>>>>> options that get set/cleared in the process of selecting kmemleak. Can
>>>>
>>>> Seems to be kmemcheck: from arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c:
>>>>
>>>> int __init kmemcheck_init(void)
>>>> {
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>>>         /*
>>>>          * Limit SMP to use a single CPU. We rely on the fact that this code
>>>>          * runs before SMP is set up.
>>>>          */
>>>>         if (setup_max_cpus > 1) {
>>>>                 printk(KERN_INFO
>>>>                         "kmemcheck: Limiting number of CPUs to 1.\n");
>>>>                 setup_max_cpus = 1;
>>>>         }
>>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Ah, ok, not my problem then ;)
>>
>> Fine, so would somebody please update the help text accessible in "menuconfig"
>> for this entry? It should be clear that it has a huge performance impact if enabled.
>> And, by compiling in it is enabled by default.
> 
> Otherwise, of no-one volunteers, please feel free to send a patch ;)

No, I am not a kernel developer. Please someone else do so update the "help text".

Moreover, it does not explain why /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online file is missing
while /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[1-3]/online do exist at the same time.

Thank you,
Martin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-03 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-31 13:35 3.10.9: kmemleak disables all CPUs except CPU0 Martin MOKREJŠ
2013-09-02 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-09-02 15:44   ` Max Filippov
2013-09-02 15:48     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-09-02 15:51       ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2013-09-02 16:09         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-09-03 13:27           ` Martin MOKREJŠ [this message]
2013-09-02 15:46   ` Martin MOKREJŠ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5225E3DB.5070507@gmail.com \
    --to=mmokrejs@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox