From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932951Ab3ICNqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:46:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:50174 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932718Ab3ICNqA (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:46:00 -0400 Message-ID: <5225E815.4010705@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 07:45:57 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Hunter CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , LKML Subject: Re: latest perf code fails to parse existing data file References: <5225051C.3030608@gmail.com> <5225844E.3090700@intel.com> <5225DAFB.1070406@gmail.com> <5225E320.8090307@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5225E320.8090307@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/3/13 7:24 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 03/09/13 15:50, David Ahern wrote: >> Kernel version? Is your kernel side support there? > > The kernel version is the same as the perf version i.e. 3.9 > >> >> For me data was collected on 2.6.34 about a week ago. Processed fine up to >> the point of this patch getting added. > > Is it only "perf trace" that fails or does "perf script" fail too? Both throw the same error. Command line used to create the file: perf record -e raw_syscalls:* -e sched:* -p 2271 -g -- sleep 5 David