From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Li, Fei" <fei.li@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"holt@sgi.com" <holt@sgi.com>,
"rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk" <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reboot: perform warm/cold reset correctly for CF9 type
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:35:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52261DC8.4070307@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BEC9F67575FA1E429CA7CF5AE9BE3634012EDD40@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 08/21/2013 08:32 PM, Li, Fei wrote:
>
> In fact, ACPI method also implements reset by writing RESET_VALUE into RESET_REG
> port. In our platform, it also uses port 0xCF9. The difference between cold and wart reset
> is whether power cycle is involved or not. After all, this is another topic.
>
> From the source code, CF9 boot method are still used by some apple MAC and dell
> platforms if I understand correctly.
>
> Back to our patch, if you really concern the effect of cold reboot 0x0E to current existed
> platforms, we can set the default value of reboot_mode as REBOOT_WARM.
>
> Does it make sense?
>
Sort-of-kind-of.
The problem here is that "cold" versus "warm" reboot seems to have
slightly different meanings for BIOS (bypass POST) and the CF9 register
(where I presume it is a "deeper" platform reset of some kind ... is it
even well-defined what the semantics are?)
I could be wrong and the cold/warm reset values in CF9 end up having
exactly the same function as the magic BIOS signature does; if so, then
I would like to be told so explicitly, ideally with an explanation about
how it works on the hw level (or a pointer to relevant documentation,
Intel internal docs are fine.)
Finally, again, does this solve a real problem?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 1:52 [PATCH] reboot: perform warm/cold reset correctly for CF9 type Li Fei
2013-08-21 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-21 7:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 8:08 ` Li, Fei
2013-08-21 9:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-22 3:32 ` Li, Fei
2013-09-03 17:35 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-09-09 1:53 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2013-09-09 2:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-21 8:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Li Fei
2013-09-10 19:51 ` [tip:x86/reboot] reboot: Allow specifying warm/ cold reset for CF9 boot type tip-bot for Li Fei
2013-09-25 17:36 ` tip-bot for Li Fei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52261DC8.4070307@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=fei.li@intel.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox