From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] extcon: Simplify extcon_dev_register() prototype by removing unnecessary parameter
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:17:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52267BFE.3030106@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130903155744.GA21846@kroah.com>
On 09/04/2013 12:57 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:13:44AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 09/02/2013 09:40 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:20:08AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> This patch remove extcon_dev_register()'s second parameter which means
>>>> the pointer of parent device to simplify prototype of this function.
>>>
>>> No, please don't. You want the parent to be passed in, as the core
>>> needs it when it is registered with the system, otherwise it will not
>>> show up in sysfs properly (i.e. you can't set it afterwards.)
>>
>> Currently, each extcon driver have allocated memory for extcon device
>> by using devm_kzalloc() in each extcon device driver.
>
> That seems backwards, the extcon core should be the one doing the
> allocation, and ownership of the device, like all other subsystem cores
> do. That makes the driver logic much simpler, and the lifetime
> ownership correct (i.e. what happens when a device is unbound from a
> driver by userspace? The driver can't control the device memory
> anymore...)
>
OK,
The extcon core will control memory allocation instead of extcon device driver
as following.
- devm_extcon_allocate_device(struct device *dev)
I'll complete this feature about memory allocation for extcon device
and resend it again. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 0:20 [PATCH 0/3] extcon: Code clean to fix up coding style and remove Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-02 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] extcon: Fix indentation coding style to improve readability Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-02 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] extcon: Change field type of 'dev' in extcon_dev structure Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-02 0:38 ` Greg KH
2013-09-02 0:41 ` Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-02 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] extcon: Simplify extcon_dev_register() prototype by removing unnecessary parameter Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-02 0:40 ` Greg KH
2013-09-02 1:13 ` Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-03 15:57 ` Greg KH
2013-09-04 0:17 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2013-09-04 1:16 ` Greg KH
2013-09-04 5:18 ` Chanwoo Choi
2013-09-08 21:51 ` Greg KH
2013-09-09 2:44 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52267BFE.3030106@samsung.com \
--to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox