From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, x86@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
david.vrabel@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 05:15:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522D3D69.5000004@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b488375-6998-4681-b105-e4c6d12ceca2@default>
Hi Boris,
Thanks for your review!
On 09/08/2013 05:14 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> ----- michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com wrote:
>
>> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from x86/xen
>> code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
>> <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 10 +++++-----
>> arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/xen/time.c | 3 +--
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> If you are cleaning up Xen's use of IRQF_DISABLED then you should
> probably also update drivers/xen/evtchn.c and drivers/xen/platform-pci.c
This definitely makes sense to do this at the same time. I've just
submitted a separate patch for this.
Thanks again,
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
+33 484 258 098
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-09 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-08 15:14 [PATCH] x86/xen: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED Boris Ostrovsky
2013-09-09 3:15 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-07 6:46 Michael Opdenacker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522D3D69.5000004@free-electrons.com \
--to=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox