Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown

Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09T18:28:45Z

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 501 bytes --]

On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 11:25 -0700, David Lang wrote:

> Given that we know that people want signed binaries without blocking kexec, you
> should have '1' just enforce module signing and '2' (or higher) implement a full
> lockdown including kexec.

There's already a kernel option for that.
--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éÝ¶\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dÊ‡Ú™ë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥