Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown

joeyli
2013-09-11T09:32:21Z

於 二，2013-09-10 於 18:26 +0000，Matthew Garrett 提到：
> On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 14:23 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > That's why modern systems require signed firmware updates.
> >
> > Linux doesn't. Is someone working on adding signature support to the
> > runtime firmware loader?
>
> It'd be simple to do so, but so far the model appears to be that devices
> that expect signed firmware enforce that themselves.
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
> NrybXǧv^)޺{.n+{y^nrz\x1ah&\x1eGh\x03(階ݢj"\x1a^[mzޖfh~m

Takashi has a implementation of firmware check:

[PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Add firmware signature file check
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/343

Thanks
Joey Lee