public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] workqueue: fix potential reentrancy issue
@ 2013-09-09  5:12 Libin
  2013-09-09 14:14 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Libin @ 2013-09-09  5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tj; +Cc: linux-kernel, wangyijing, guohanjun, huawei.libin

From: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>

When one work starts execution, the high bits of work's data contain
pool ID. It can represent a maximum of WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE. Pool ID
is assigned WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE when the work being initialized
indicating that no pool is associated and get_work_pool() uses it to
check the associated pool. So if worker_pool_assign_id() assigns a
ID greater than or equal WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE to a pool, it may break
the non-reentrance guarantee.

This patch fix this issue by modifying the worker_pool_assign_id()
function to add the WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE check condition.

Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 41019b1..97d9ff7 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -518,7 +518,14 @@ static inline void debug_work_activate(struct work_struct *work) { }
 static inline void debug_work_deactivate(struct work_struct *work) { }
 #endif
 
-/* allocate ID and assign it to @pool */
+/**
+ * worker_pool_assign_id - allocate ID and assing it to @pool
+ * @pool: the pool pointer of interest
+ *
+ * Return 0 if ID assigned successful.
+ * Return non-zero if the allocation fails or the ID number out of
+ * %WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE range.
+ */
 static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -526,6 +533,8 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
 	ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (ret >= WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE)
+		return ret;
 	if (ret >= 0) {
 		pool->id = ret;
 		return 0;
-- 
1.8.2.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] workqueue: fix potential reentrancy issue
  2013-09-09  5:12 [PATCH] workqueue: fix potential reentrancy issue Libin
@ 2013-09-09 14:14 ` Tejun Heo
  2013-09-10  0:33   ` Libin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2013-09-09 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Libin; +Cc: linux-kernel, wangyijing, guohanjun

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:12:14PM +0800, Libin wrote:
> From: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
> 
> When one work starts execution, the high bits of work's data contain
> pool ID. It can represent a maximum of WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE. Pool ID
> is assigned WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE when the work being initialized
> indicating that no pool is associated and get_work_pool() uses it to
> check the associated pool. So if worker_pool_assign_id() assigns a
> ID greater than or equal WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE to a pool, it may break
> the non-reentrance guarantee.
> 
> This patch fix this issue by modifying the worker_pool_assign_id()
> function to add the WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE check condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 41019b1..97d9ff7 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -518,7 +518,14 @@ static inline void debug_work_activate(struct work_struct *work) { }
>  static inline void debug_work_deactivate(struct work_struct *work) { }
>  #endif
>  
> -/* allocate ID and assign it to @pool */
> +/**
> + * worker_pool_assign_id - allocate ID and assing it to @pool
> + * @pool: the pool pointer of interest
> + *
> + * Return 0 if ID assigned successful.
> + * Return non-zero if the allocation fails or the ID number out of
> + * %WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE range.
> + */
>  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -526,6 +533,8 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
>  
>  	ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (ret >= WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE)
> +		return ret;

Hmmm.... this would leak the allocated ID.  Just setting @end param to
idr_alloc to WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE would work, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] workqueue: fix potential reentrancy issue
  2013-09-09 14:14 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2013-09-10  0:33   ` Libin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Libin @ 2013-09-10  0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: linux-kernel, wangyijing, guohanjun

Hello Tejun,
On 2013/9/9 22:14, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:12:14PM +0800, Libin wrote:
>> From: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
>>
>> When one work starts execution, the high bits of work's data contain
>> pool ID. It can represent a maximum of WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE. Pool ID
>> is assigned WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE when the work being initialized
>> indicating that no pool is associated and get_work_pool() uses it to
>> check the associated pool. So if worker_pool_assign_id() assigns a
>> ID greater than or equal WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE to a pool, it may break
>> the non-reentrance guarantee.
>>
>> This patch fix this issue by modifying the worker_pool_assign_id()
>> function to add the WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE check condition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/workqueue.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
>> index 41019b1..97d9ff7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
>> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
>> @@ -518,7 +518,14 @@ static inline void debug_work_activate(struct work_struct *work) { }
>>  static inline void debug_work_deactivate(struct work_struct *work) { }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -/* allocate ID and assign it to @pool */
>> +/**
>> + * worker_pool_assign_id - allocate ID and assing it to @pool
>> + * @pool: the pool pointer of interest
>> + *
>> + * Return 0 if ID assigned successful.
>> + * Return non-zero if the allocation fails or the ID number out of
>> + * %WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE range.
>> + */
>>  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
>>  {
>>  	int ret;
>> @@ -526,6 +533,8 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
>>  	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
>>  
>>  	ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (ret >= WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> Hmmm.... this would leak the allocated ID.  Just setting @end param to
> idr_alloc to WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE would work, right?
> 

Yes, I will update it with the last patch.
Thanks!
Libin

> Thanks.
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-10  0:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-09  5:12 [PATCH] workqueue: fix potential reentrancy issue Libin
2013-09-09 14:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-09-10  0:33   ` Libin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox