From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
joro@8bytes.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:43:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522EB171.6000909@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378717669.2627.239.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
(2013/09/09 18:07), David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 16:15 +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
>>
>> This causes problem on kdump. Devices are working in first kernel, and
>> after switching to second kernel and initializing IOMMU, many DMAR faults
>> occur and it causes problems like driver error or PCI SERR, at last
>> kdump fails. This patch fixes this problem.
>
> I'm not sure I'd call this a fix.
>
> If the driver is so broken that it cannot get the device working again
> after a fault, surely the driver needs to be fixed?
Yes,this problem may be solved by fixing driver. Actually megaraid sas
driver is recently fixed for this problem. (See commit 6431f5d7)
But I think root cause of this problem is initializing IOMMU while DMA
is still working, and I want to solve the root cause rather than
handling it in each driver, otherwise we have to fix driver each time we
find this kind of problem.
>
> If the system is suffering an IRQ storm because device doesn't give up
> after the first few faults, then we should switch off the fault
> *reporting* for that device so that its faults get ignored (until it
> next actually sets up a DMA mapping, or something).
In such a case, yeah limiting messages is enough.
>
> For the IOMMU code to reset individual devices, just because they still
> have an active DMA mapping even if they're not *doing* DMA, seems wrong.
> You'll even end up resetting devices just because they have an RMRR,
> won't you? (Although I wouldn't lose any sleep over that, I suppose. In
> fact it might be a *feature*... :)
Right, current code is resetting devices which *may* be doing DMA. The
ideal way is finding devices which are actually doing DMA and reset only
them but I don't know how we can do this, though I think current code
is sufficient.
Thanks,
Takao Indoh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 7:15 [PATCH] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU Takao Indoh
2013-09-08 11:47 ` Baoquan He
2013-09-09 4:28 ` Takao Indoh
2013-09-09 4:46 ` Takao Indoh
2013-09-09 9:07 ` David Woodhouse
2013-09-10 5:43 ` Takao Indoh [this message]
2013-09-18 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522EB171.6000909@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox