From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, rob@landley.net,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-on time through constraints
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:34:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522F5815.4070109@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130910165153.GQ29403@sirena.org.uk>
On 09/10/2013 10:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:11:13AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>>> +- regulator-enable-time: Turn ON time for regulator(in uS)
>
>> Bike-shedding slightly: This isn't really the time it takes to
>> enable a regulator, but the time the voltage takes to become
>> stable, or settle. Perhaps name the property
>> regulator-settle-time/regulator-settle-delay?
>
> The normal term would be ramp delay. It's not usually the time
> taken to completely settle, it's usually quoted as the time taken
> to reach within some proportion of the target voltage.
I notice there's a regulator-ramp-delay property, already documented
right above this new property. Is this a conflicting usage of the same
term, or should that existing property just be used in this case too?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 11:18 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: palmas: configure enable time for LDOs Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-10 11:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-on time through constraints Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-10 12:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-09-10 13:14 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-10 16:33 ` Mark Brown
2013-09-10 15:11 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-10 16:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-09-10 17:34 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-09-10 17:38 ` Mark Brown
2013-09-10 17:45 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-10 18:19 ` Mark Brown
2013-09-10 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: palmas: configure enable time for LDOs Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522F5815.4070109@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox