public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: davidlohr.bueso@hp.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc,msg: shorten critical region in msgsnd
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:20:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5231B181.7080705@colorfullife.com> (raw)

Hi Davidlohr,

I think the patch (3dd1f784ed6603d7ab1043e51e6371235edf2313) is still 
unsafe, i.e. my correction (bebcb928c820d0ee83aca4b192adc195e43e66a2) 
doesn't fix everything:

AFAICS, ipc_obtain_object_check:
- look up the id in the idr tree
- check if it is deleted
- return without taking any locks.

This means that the "is not deleted" information can be stale immediately.

Thus do_msgsnd() in ipc/msg.c contains a memory leak:
>        rcu_read_lock();
>         msq = msq_obtain_object_check(ns, msqid);
>         if (IS_ERR(msq)) {
>                 err = PTR_ERR(msq);
>                 goto out_unlock1;
>         }
<<<< what if the code is preempted here and RMID is processed?
The code below would queue the message into an already removed queue.
The queue is freed by the rcu callback, but the message memory is leaked.

> ipc_lock_object(&msq->q_perm);
>

Is this analysis correct?

And: What about the other users of obtain_object_check?
exit_sem() is also quite long, but I didn't spot any obvious problems.

--
     Manfred

             reply	other threads:[~2013-09-12 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-12 12:20 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2013-09-12 15:10 ` [PATCH] ipc,msg: shorten critical region in msgsnd Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5231B181.7080705@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox