From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754718Ab3IMS2K (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:28:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:49971 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752046Ab3IMS2I (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:28:08 -0400 Message-ID: <52335935.1020307@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:28:05 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Desnoyers CC: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Richard Cochran , Prarit Bhargava , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Introduce timekeeper latch synchronization References: <20130913025253.GA17218@Krystal> <523345EC.8070206@efficios.com> <52334E5A.4050609@linaro.org> <20130913182020.GB32317@Krystal> In-Reply-To: <20130913182020.GB32317@Krystal> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/13/2013 11:20 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > This looks to me like interesting optimisation work that should be > considered after the following question is answered: does the added > update-side cost actually matter that much ? Yea, fair enough. We can measure the cost first. thanks -john