From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754561Ab3IMTU1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:20:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:62463 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753945Ab3IMTU0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:20:26 -0400 Message-ID: <52336576.1060908@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:20:22 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Desnoyers CC: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , Richard Cochran , Prarit Bhargava , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Introduce timekeeper latch synchronization References: <20130913025253.GA17218@Krystal> <20130913153020.GA24383@Krystal> In-Reply-To: <20130913153020.GA24383@Krystal> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/13/2013 08:30 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > By the way, if there are some standard test-bench for timekeeping, I'd > be very interested to hear about them. I've got a git repo of tests that I use for basic sanity checks here: https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests.git thanks -john