From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753242Ab3INIBN (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2013 04:01:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:44090 "EHLO mail-ee0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831Ab3INIBK (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2013 04:01:10 -0400 Message-ID: <523417BF.7030505@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:01:03 +0200 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130827 Icedove/17.0.8 To: =?UTF-8?B?U8O2cmVuIEJyaW5rbWFubg==?= CC: Guenter Roeck , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , Hyun Kwon , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Stephen Warren , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Grant Likely , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: si570: Add a driver for SI570 oscillators References: <1379033737-30015-1-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <1379033737-30015-2-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <20130913170005.GB5681@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/13/2013 07:26 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:00:05AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:55:37PM -0700, Soren Brinkmann wrote: >>> Add a driver for SILabs 570, 571, 598, 599 programmable oscillators. >>> The devices generate low-jitter clock signals and are reprogrammable via >>> an I2C interface. >>> >>> Cc: Guenter Roeck >>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann >>> --- [...] >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-si570.c b/drivers/clk/clk-si570.c >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..960d689 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-si570.c >>> @@ -0,0 +1,546 @@ [...] >>> + match = of_match_node(clk_si570_of_match, client->dev.of_node); >>> + if (!match) >>> + return -EINVAL; >> >> Seems unusual. Is this really needed ? It precludes the driver from being used >> in a non-devicetree environment, for example. I would guess that there is a match >> if client->dev.of_node is set. Otherwise, this code would be needed in every >> driver supporting devicetree, and I don't recall seeing that. >> >>> + ddata = match->data; >>> + >> You should be able to get this information (ie the pointer to si570_device_data) >> from id->driver_data. That would be more consistent with other i2c devices. > I think I copied this approach from the other clk-si... driver. I'll > do some research on your suggestion and change it. Could you point me to > an example for your proposal? Soeren, I sent a patch for the match removal in clk-si5351 [1]. Mike must have missed it, I will resend soon. You can take that as "an example for the proposal" above. Sebastian [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/3/484