Re: [PATCH] doc: fix some typos

[Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>]

On 2013/9/15 0:49, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> On 09/13/13 20:49, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> index 0cfb00f..ca278d5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ stack contents as the probed function.  When it is done, the handler
>>  calls jprobe_return(), which traps again to restore the original stack
>>  contents and processor state and switch to the probed function.
>>  
>> -By convention, the callee owns its arguments, so gcc may produce code
> 
> Are you sure about that?
> It looks correct to me (before the patch).
>

Hi Randy, you are right, I confused caller and callee.

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

>> +By convention, the caller owns its arguments, so gcc may produce code
>>  that unexpectedly modifies that portion of the stack.  This is why
>>  Kprobes saves a copy of the stack and restores it after the jprobe
>>  handler has run.  Up to MAX_STACK_SIZE bytes are copied -- e.g.,
>>
> 
>