linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, swarren@nvidia.com,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: "memory" binding issues
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:17:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52372F2A.2050003@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379300274.4098.77.camel@pasglop>

On 09/15/2013 08:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> [resent to the right list this time around]
> 
> Hi folks !
> 
> So I don't have the bandwidth to follow closely what's going on, but I
> just today noticed the crackpot that went into 3.11 as part of commit:
> 
> 9d8eab7af79cb4ce2de5de39f82c455b1f796963
> drivers: of: add initialization code for dma reserved memory
> 
> Fist of all, do NOT add (or change) a binding as part of a patch
> implementing code, it's gross.

Personally, I would argue the opposite; it's much easier to see what's
going on when it's all together in one patch. Ensuring ABI stability can
only be achieved through code review, i.e. splitting into separate
DT/code patches won't achieve that, so that argument doesn't affect this.

...
> Additionally, it has the following issues:
> 
>  - It describes the "memory" node as /memory, which is WRONG
> 
> It should be "/memory@unit-address, this is important because the Linux
> kernel of_find_device_by_path() isn't smart enough to do partial
> searches (unlike the real OFW one) and thus to ignore the unit address
> for search purposes, and you *need* the unit address if you have
> multiple memory nodes (which you typically do on NUMA machines).

Perhaps /memory should have had a unit-address, but it never has had on
ARM; see arch/arm/boot/dts/skeleton.dtsi which says:

        memory { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };

... and the fact that reg in /memory can have multiple entries seems to
support the expectation we only have a single node here. I'm not sure
how we could possibly change this now it's become so entrenched?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-16 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-16  2:57 "memory" binding issues Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-16 15:22 ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-16 22:42   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-17 15:53     ` Kumar Gala
2013-09-16 16:17 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-09-16 22:46   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-16 22:48     ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-16 23:47       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-16 23:48         ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-17  1:37           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-17  7:56       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-17 16:43         ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-17 21:08           ` Frank Rowand
2013-09-17 21:15             ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-17 21:19               ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-17 21:33                 ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-17 23:04                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-17 23:25                     ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-17 21:56               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-18 16:28               ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-19  0:29                 ` David Gibson
2013-09-18  1:25             ` David Gibson
2013-09-18  1:31         ` Grant Likely
2013-09-18  1:38     ` Grant Likely
2013-09-18  8:08       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-18  2:57 ` Grant Likely
2013-09-18  8:21   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-09-27 15:42     ` Kumar Gala
2013-10-03 15:04       ` Kumar Gala
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-16  2:41 Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52372F2A.2050003@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).