From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752298Ab3IUFwv (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:52:51 -0400 Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:53472 "EHLO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752066Ab3IUFwu (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:52:50 -0400 Message-ID: <523D333C.1090609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:18:44 +0530 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar CC: Linus Walleij , Russell King - ARM Linux , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kristoffer Ericson Subject: Re: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1 References: <45987104.t6r4hvPgQn@vostro.rjw.lan> <523AF22F.1010909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <523C6A88.30800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13092105-1396-0000-0000-0000039672FB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/20/2013 10:31 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 September 2013 22:04, Linus Walleij wrote: >> In this case we have neither. So the cpufreq driver fails to >> register. But the kernel used to survive in any case, as you >> could call cpufreq_get() without a cpufreq driver registered. > > Aha, so exactly what I suspected in my first mail.. > Yep, your analysis was perfect right from the beginning :-) Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat