From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753061Ab3IWFsC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 01:48:02 -0400
Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:1660 "EHLO radon.swed.at"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752830Ab3IWFsB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 01:48:01 -0400
Message-ID: <523FD60C.9090207@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:47:56 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Would an "information module" be useful?
References: <l1n80j$ofi$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAFLxGvweL_O16TwvERsMSwf1UPa5BFwSyFNNRu6Z1CD4ExZXSg@mail.gmail.com> <523F4A55.3090106@web.de> <523F4C2A.3050207@nod.at> <523F5361.8040906@web.de> <523F551A.20101@nod.at> <523FA9A6.40600@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <523FA9A6.40600@web.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Markus,

Am 23.09.2013 04:38, schrieb Markus Elfring:
> Would it become useful to move "drivers" which do not manage hardware to a
> separate directory?
> Should such source files belong to a different software category (or "class")?

IMHO it would be not very useful.
We have more serious issues to solve. :-)

Thanks,
//richard