From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753211Ab3IWU1r (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:27:47 -0400 Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de ([134.100.9.70]:38721 "EHLO mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752125Ab3IWU1q (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:27:46 -0400 Message-ID: <5240A46B.3080408@metafoo.de> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:28:27 +0200 From: Lars-Peter Clausen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130827 Icedove/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: of_get_regulation_constraints: Use node name as fallback References: <1379846854-11746-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20130923101551.GY21013@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130923101551.GY21013@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/23/2013 12:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the devicetree >> node as a fallback. > > You're not supposed to use the node name for anything, the goal is that > it's entirely ornamental noise. Which is a bit annoying but there we > are. > Is this documented somewhere? I'd be interested in the rationale behind this.