From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753502Ab3IXAcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:32:39 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:26769 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751671Ab3IXAci (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:32:38 -0400 Message-ID: <5240DD83.1070509@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:32:03 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner , LKML , cgroups , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] memcg, cgroup: kill css id References: <524001F8.6070205@huawei.com> <20130923130816.GH30946@htj.dyndns.org> <20130923131215.GI30946@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130923131215.GI30946@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.68.215] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2013/9/23 21:12, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:08:16AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:55:20PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >>> The whole patchset has been acked and reviewed by Michal and Tejun. >>> Could you merge it into mm tree? >> >> Ah... I really hoped that this had been merged during -rc1 window. >> Andrew, would it be okay to carry this series through cgroup tree? It >> doesn't really have much to do with mm proper and it's a PITA to have >> to keep updating css_id code from cgroup side when it's scheduled to >> go away. If carried in -mm, it's likely to cause conflicts with >> ongoing cgroup changes too. I would love to see this patchset go through cgroup tree. The changes to memcg is quite small, and as -mm tree is based on -next it won't cause future conflicts. > > Also, wasn't this already in -mm during the last devel cycle? ISTR > conflicts with it in -mm with other cgroup core changes. Is there any > specific reason why this wasn't merged during the merge windw? > No, it never went into -mm tree... I guess it's because Andrew was too busy and overlooked this patchset?