From: Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Issues with AMD microcode updates
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:35:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524221A5.9070808@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130919164409.GA9427@pd.tnic>
On 09/19/2013 11:44 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:58:34AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> Jacob, Andreas,
>>
>> I take care of the amd64 microcode update support for Debian, and I'm
>> receiving user reports of lockup issues with the AMD microcode driver in
>> several kernels. This is about the runtime update interface,
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/microcode/reload and
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload.
>>
>> Basically, the issue is that the process that tries to write "1" to the
>> reload node gets stuck in "D" state on several kernel versions.
>>
>> I started by blacklisting several older kernels (e.g. I got a report of
>> 2.6.38 locking up), but recently I got a report of a lockup with kernel
>> 3.5.1. Blacklisting everything before 3.10 is not exactly kosher, not when
>> I would have to blindly trust 3.0, 3.2 and 3.4 to not have whatever issue is
>> causing the lockups.
>>
>> IMHO that's the point where it becomes interesting to actually track down
>> the bug even if it apparently doesn't exist anymore on the more recent
>> kernels, and ensure that the stable/long-term kernels have the fix. That
>> would also help distros blacklist microcode update on the broken kernels.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't own, or have access to, any boxes with an AMD
>> processor (let alone one with an AMD processor in need of a microcode
>> update) to bissect the problem.
>>
>> I'd appreciate if AMD (or anyone with an AMD processor, really) could help
>> me track this issue down.
>>
>> Debian bug reports:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717185
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723081
> Well, both Andreas and Jacob don't work for AMD anymore. I could try to
> help with this but it'll be slow as I'm pretty busy with other stuff.
>
> Anyway, I'd suggest we look only on the long term kernels since they're
> the only ones which can get updates/fixes anyway.
>
> Now, how do I reproduce this? Writing 1 to .../reload on latest kernel
> works here. So I'd need a reproducer. Alternatively, I'd need a sysrq-l
> and sysrq-w from those systems with hung processes.
>
> Thanks.
>
You can direct AMD microcode issues to me now.
We are setting up some systems in the lab and trying to duplicate
the problem now.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 14:58 Issues with AMD microcode updates Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-09-19 16:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-19 18:15 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-09-19 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-19 19:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-09-24 23:35 ` Sherry Hurwitz [this message]
2013-09-25 13:49 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-09-26 17:36 ` Sherry Hurwitz
2013-09-27 19:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524221A5.9070808@amd.com \
--to=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox