From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@nvidia.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] usb-storage: scsiglue: Changing the command result
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:05:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52441C1F.8020200@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52441AA7.9070300@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2117 bytes --]
Hi,
There was a recent commit in mainline for the scsi devices which do not
respond properly to medium access command:
commit 18a4d0a22ed6c54b67af7718c305cd010f09ddf8
[SCSI] Handle disk devices which can not process medium access commands
We have experienced several devices which fail in a fashion we do not
currently handle gracefully in SCSI. After a failure these devices will
respond to the SCSI primary command set (INQUIRY, TEST UNIT READY, etc.)
but any command accessing the storage medium will time out.
I came across a USB drive which showed similar problem and what I see is
usb storage is still not able to cope with such devices properly.
The control flow downwards is like:
scsi_times_out --> Setting cmd->result as DID_TIME_OUT
scsi_error_handler
scsi_unjam_host
scsi_eh_abort_cmds
command_abort (sets US_FLIDX_TIMED_OUT for us->dflags
calls stop_transport,
and waits for) usb_stor_control_thread (which is waiting for
transport call to return inside
usb_stor_invoke_transport)
both usb_stor_control_thread and
usb_stor_invoke_transport
check for us->dflags timed_out bit and
set the result as DID_ABORT
and signal completion for command_abort
to complete
......
sd_eh_action
checks for cmd->result and finds out that it's DID_ABORT rather than
DID_TIME_OUT.
This patch updates the command result to be TIME_OUT explicitly before
returning from command_abort in scsiglue.c.
I would like to know if this patch can work out for such USB Storage
devices? What would be the better way to do the same?
Regards,
Vishal Annapurve
[-- Attachment #2: usb_storage_scsi_medium_access_timeout.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1147 bytes --]
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] usb-storage: Changing the command result
This change updates the returned result to scsi layer to use
DID_TIMEOUT flag as a result status rather than DID_ABORT for
commands aborted due to timeout.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index a74e9d8..e7b532e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
@@ -353,6 +353,15 @@ static int command_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *srb)
/* Wait for the aborted command to finish */
wait_for_completion(&us->notify);
+ /* Given that this bit would be only set in case of timedout
+ * command, we can return with DID_TIME_OUT, as scsi layer needs
+ * to use this result rather than DID_ABORT.
+ * This is a WR to avoid removing DID_ABORT altogether
+ * and before the final control goes to scsi layer change the
+ * result to be timedout.
+ */
+ us->srb->result = DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
+
return SUCCESS;
}
--
1.8.4
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <52441AA7.9070300@nvidia.com>
2013-09-26 11:35 ` Vishal Annapurve [this message]
2013-10-15 7:29 ` [PATCH] usb-storage: scsiglue: Changing the command result Ming Lei
2013-10-15 15:54 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-15 16:29 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-10-15 17:02 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-15 17:53 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-10-15 20:22 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-16 0:40 ` Ming Lei
2013-10-16 14:39 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-18 5:38 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-10-18 14:10 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-19 11:32 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-10-21 17:23 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-26 15:49 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-10-26 19:33 ` Alan Stern
2013-10-27 3:33 ` Greg KH
2013-11-16 6:53 Vishal Annapurve
2013-11-18 15:08 ` Alan Stern
2013-12-09 1:59 ` Greg KH
2013-12-09 9:44 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-12-09 9:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-12-09 11:23 ` Greg KH
2013-12-10 5:23 ` Vishal Annapurve
2013-12-10 5:55 ` Greg KH
2013-12-10 11:37 ` Vishal Annapurve
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-16 6:55 Vishal Annapurve
2013-11-16 6:55 Vishal Annapurve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52441C1F.8020200@nvidia.com \
--to=vannapurve@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox