From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Fix scalability problem on callchain merging (v4)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 07:46:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52443ABC.8020808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380185890-25758-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
On 9/26/13 2:58 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a new version of callchain improvement patchset. I found and
> fixed bugs in the previous version. I verified that it produced
> exactly same output before and after applying rbtree conversion patch
> (#1). However after Frederic's new comm infrastructure patches are
> applied it'd be little different.
>
> The patches are on 'perf/callchain-v4' branch in my tree
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
>
Given recent breakage, has the patchset been run through any tests on
older kernels that do not support sample_id_all? e.g., 2.6.34 (WRL4).
What about tests with the other perf commands -- script to dump events,
trace on a file with with multiple processes -- to verify no impact on
comm output, especially multithreaded processes with named threads. I
can certainly do those tests in time, but can't guarantee a timeframe
and want to make sure it gets done before merging.
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 8:58 [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Fix scalability problem on callchain merging (v4) Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf callchain: Convert children list to rbtree Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 10:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-08 2:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-08 19:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-10 1:06 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf ui/progress: Add new helper functions for progress bar Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf tools: Show progress on histogram collapsing Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf tools: Use an accessor to read thread comm Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: Add time argument on comm setting Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf tools: Compare hists comm by addresses Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 8:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Get current comm instead of last one Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 10:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-08 1:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 9:34 ` [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Fix scalability problem on callchain merging (v4) Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 2:08 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-26 13:46 ` David Ahern [this message]
2013-09-26 14:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-27 2:10 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52443ABC.8020808@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).