Re: [PATCH v4] media: st-rc: Add ST remote control driver

[Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>]

Hi Stephen,

On 24/09/13 20:49, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> >> Should those property names be prefixed with "st,"; I assume they're
>>> >> specific to this binding rather than something generic that applies to
>>> >> all IR controller bindings? If you expect them to be generic, it's fine.
>> > 
>> > Officially these bindings are not specified in ePAPR specs
> Well, there are plenty of properties we now consider generic that aren't
> in ePAPR...
> 
>> > but I see no reason for not having these properties as generic ones.
>> >
>> > Are you ok with that?
> I suppose that infrared-vs-uhf is a concept that's probably common
> enough across any similar HW device, so it may make sense for these
> properties to be generic. If we do intend them to be generic, I'd
> suggest they be defined in some generic binding document though; perhaps
> something like bindings/media/ir.txt or
> bindings/media/remote-control.txt? That way, a HW-specific binding isn't
> the only place where a supposedly generic property is defined.

For now I will send a v5 for this driver with these generic properties.

And, I will send an separate RFC for the generic binding document
(bindings/media/remote-control.txt) so that we can get more inputs from
others as well.

Thanks,
srini

> 
>