From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix pty master read() after slave closes
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:32:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5245C12E.6070608@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380302825-12539-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
On 09/27/2013 01:27 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> Commit f95499c3030fe1bfad57745f2db1959c5b43dca8,
> n_tty: Don't wait for buffer work in read() loop
> creates a race window which can cause a pty master read()
> to miss the last pty slave write(s) and return -EIO instead,
> thus signalling the pty slave is closed. This can happen when
> the pty slave is written and immediately closed but before the
> tty buffer i/o loop receives the new input; the pty master
> read() is scheduled, sees its read buffer is empty and the
> pty slave has been closed, and exits.
>
> Because tty_flush_to_ldisc() has significant performance impact
> for parallel i/o, rather than revert the commit, special case this
> condition (ie., when the read buffer is empty and the 'other' pty
> has been closed) and, only then, wait for buffer work to complete
> before re-testing if the read buffer is still empty.
>
> As before, subsequent pty master reads return any available data
> until no more data is available, and then returns -EIO to
> indicate the pty slave has closed.
>
> Reported-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
I tested this patch with the gcc ada ACATS testsuite and got this
summary so all seems ok with this patch.
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 805
# of unexpected failures 0
...
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 772
# of unexpected failures 0
...
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 743
# of unexpected failures 0
Mikael,
I'd appreciate if you could re-test with this patch and
confirm the issue is fixed.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 12:18 [REGRESSION][BISECTED] 3.12-rc "n_tty: Don't wait for buffer work in read() loop" patch breaks gcc's testsuite Mikael Pettersson
2013-09-25 13:50 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-25 13:52 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 20:07 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-27 17:27 ` [PATCH] tty: Fix pty master read() after slave closes Peter Hurley
2013-09-27 17:32 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-09-28 17:36 ` Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5245C12E.6070608@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpelinux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox