From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752806Ab3JARjQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:39:16 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:55166 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751964Ab3JARjN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:39:13 -0400 Message-ID: <524B08BD.2020902@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:39:09 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter De Schrijver CC: Mike Turquette , Prashant Gaikwad , Thierry Reding , Joseph Lo , Paul Walmsley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Introduce common infra for tegra clocks References: <1379946381-20125-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <1379946381-20125-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/23/2013 08:24 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > This patchset introduces common infrastructure for clocks which exist in > several Tegra SoCs. We also move Tegra114 to this new infrastructure. > Tegra20 and Tegra30 will be moved later in separate patchsets. > > Changes since v1: > + move common clks allocation to patch 2 > + adapt also Tegra20 and Tegra30 to the changes in patch 2 > > Boottested on dalmore, beaverboard and seaboard. What commit is this series based on? I applied the two pre-requisites: ARM: tegra114: add missing clocks to binding.eml clk: tegra: replace enum tegra114_clk by binding header.eml ... but still got a bunch of conflicts when applying this. I guess at least commit 819c1de "clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag" isn't in the history of this series. Consequently, I gave up and didn't test this. Also, I had given a lot of feedback on v1. Admittedly I should have reviewed v2 since it appeared just before I reviewed v1, but I expect most of the feedback still applies given the limited list of changes listed above. Certainly, this series still removes the "dsib" clock yet I expect it shouldn't (patch 1, in the change to tegra114_periph_clk_init()), and that's the very first piece of feedback I gave on v1, and also causes the first "git am" conflict with CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT.