From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 03/11] cpufreq: remove invalid comment from __cpufreq_remove_dev()
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:55:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524D1BD6.4040608@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d25692a141042a3d4d6fab310029e96fbe57822.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 10/02/2013 02:13 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Some section of kerneldoc comment for __cpufreq_remove_dev() is invalid now.
> Remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index ae866b1..d80cbe6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1260,8 +1260,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> * __cpufreq_remove_dev - remove a CPU device
> *
> * Removes the cpufreq interface for a CPU device.
> - * Caller should already have policy_rwsem in write mode for this CPU.
> - * This routine frees the rwsem before returning.
> */
> static inline int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
> struct subsys_interface *sif,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[not found] ` <b361f4df33e414ecd2e8a25959746e84da789d6a.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-10-03 7:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 01/11] cpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void Srivatsa S. Bhat
[not found] ` <fef9eba980ca340b3f1b1a56e92c84f6bb0f5d81.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-10-03 7:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 02/11] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per cpu cpu_policy_rwsem Srivatsa S. Bhat
[not found] ` <0d25692a141042a3d4d6fab310029e96fbe57822.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-10-03 7:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
[not found] ` <f70f2486e3107448d1d3b835b78ad20724fdd252.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-10-03 7:26 ` [PATCH RESEND 04/11] cpufreq: Remove extra blank line Srivatsa S. Bhat
[not found] ` <7b34bf61846bed19e4a7e8ee18a55e717c570fef.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-10-03 7:32 ` [PATCH RESEND 09/11] cpufreq: rewrite cpufreq_driver->flags using shift operator Srivatsa S. Bhat
[not found] ` <4c9af8dda1c4f968e08815632cea3987d0426127.1380703248.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-10-03 7:39 ` [PATCH RESEND 10/11] cpufreq: use cpufreq_driver->flags to mark CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524D1BD6.4040608@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox