Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc.c: set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10 which express the maximize size of "%d" or "%u".

[Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>]

Hello Al Viro:

Is this patch correct?  ;-)

Thanks.

On 10/05/2013 11:19 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Theoretically, the maximize size of "%d" or "%u" is 11 (10 + '\0'), so
> need set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10.
> 
> In real world, it may not cause issue, but still recommend to fix this
> 'theoretical' bug (especially original definition already considered
> about 'theoretical' using).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/proc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c
> index 36f6ee1..4e9a9ee 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void register_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action)
>  
>  #undef MAX_NAMELEN
>  
> -#define MAX_NAMELEN 10
> +#define MAX_NAMELEN 11
>  
>  void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
> 


-- 
Chen Gang