public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] intel_mid: Moved board related code to a new file
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:45:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525DE197.5040607@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525DD571.20107@linux.intel.com>

On 10/15/2013 04:53 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 04:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 04:42 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>> +#define intel_mid_sfi_dev(i)   \
>>> +        static const struct devs_id *__intel_mid_sfi_##i##_dev __used \
>>> +        __attribute__((__section__(".x86_intel_mid_dev.init"))) = &i
>>> +
>>
>> Any reason to not just call this "sfi_device()" or something similar?
>> "Intel MID SFI" seems a bit redundant...
> 
> I had the same though. But struct devs_id is defined by asm/intel-mid.h.
> This function is not meant to be used by any other user beside
> intel-mid.
> But I can change if you prefer.
> 

Hm, I guess it doesn't really matter.  After all, no other devices will
probably ever see SFI (we hope).

	-hpa



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-16  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-15 23:42 [PATCH v4 00/12] rework arch/x86/platform/[mrst => intel-mid] David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mrst: Fixed printk/pr_* related issues David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] mrst: Fixed indentation issues David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mrst: Fixed checkpatch warnings David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] intel_mid: Renamed *mrst* to *intel_mid* David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] " David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] intel_mid: Refactored sfi_parse_devs() function David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] intel_mid: Added custom device_handler support David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] intel_mid: Added custom handler for ipc devices David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] intel_mid: Moved SFI related code to sfi.c David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] intel-mid: sfi: allow struct devs_id.get_platform_data to be NULL David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86: intel-mid: add section for sfi device table David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] intel_mid: Moved board related code to a new file David Cohen
2013-10-15 23:44   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-15 23:53     ` David Cohen
2013-10-16  0:45       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-10-16  3:59         ` David Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525DE197.5040607@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox