linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:56:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525F51DF.4080809@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131008103830.180541879@infradead.org>

On 10/08/2013 06:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> 
> It is functionally equivalent to
> 
>         struct rcu_sync_struct {
>                 atomic_t counter;
>         };
> 
>         static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *xxx)
>         {
>                 return atomic_read(&xxx->counter) == 0;
>         }
> 
>         static inline void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *xxx)
>         {
>                 atomic_inc(&xxx->counter);
>                 synchronize_sched();
>         }
> 
>         static inline void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *xxx)
>         {
>                 synchronize_sched();
>                 atomic_dec(&xxx->counter);
>         }
> 
> except: it records the state and synchronize_sched() is only called by
> rcu_sync_enter() and only if necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130929183634.GA15563@redhat.com
> ---
>  include/linux/rcusync.h |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/Makefile         |    3 -
>  kernel/rcusync.c        |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +#define _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +
> +struct rcu_sync_struct {
> +	int			gp_state;
> +	int			gp_count;
> +	wait_queue_head_t	gp_wait;
> +
> +	int			cb_state;
> +	struct rcu_head		cb_head;
> +
> +	void (*sync)(void);
> +	void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
> +};
> +
> +#define ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)						\
> +	.gp_state = 0,							\
> +	.gp_count = 0,							\
> +	.gp_wait = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.gp_wait),		\
> +	.cb_state = 0
> +
> +#define __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name) {					\
> +	___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name),						\
> +	.sync = synchronize_sched,					\
> +	.call = call_rcu_sched,						\
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name) {					\
> +	___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name),						\
> +	.sync = synchronize_rcu_bh,					\
> +	.call = call_rcu_bh,						\
> +}
> +
> +#define __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) {						\
> +	___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name),						\
> +	.sync = synchronize_rcu,					\
> +	.call = call_rcu,						\
> +}
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SCHED_SYNC(name)					\
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_BH_SYNC(name)					\
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_RCU_SYNC(name)						\
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)
> +
> +static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> +	return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
> +}

Hi, All

We may need to use ACCESS_ONCE() here to avoid the compiler access it multi-times.

it would be better: return ACCESS_ONCE(rss->gp_state) == GP_IDLE;


-my comment continues until it reaches a "Thanks".-

> +
> +enum rcu_sync_type { RCU_SYNC, RCU_SCHED_SYNC, RCU_BH_SYNC };
> +
> +extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
> +extern void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +extern void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_ */
> +
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ obj-y     = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o
>  	    kthread.o wait.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
>  	    hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o srcu.o semaphore.o \
>  	    notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \
> -	    async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o
> +	    async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o \
> +	    rcusync.o
>  
>  ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
>  # Do not trace debug files and internal ftrace files
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/rcusync.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +
> +#include <linux/rcusync.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +
> +enum { GP_IDLE = 0, GP_PENDING, GP_PASSED };
> +enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
> +
> +#define	rss_lock	gp_wait.lock
> +
> +void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss, enum rcu_sync_type type)
> +{
> +	memset(rss, 0, sizeof(*rss));
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&rss->gp_wait);
> +
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case RCU_SYNC:
> +		rss->sync = synchronize_rcu;
> +		rss->call = call_rcu;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case RCU_SCHED_SYNC:
> +		rss->sync = synchronize_sched;
> +		rss->call = call_rcu_sched;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case RCU_BH_SYNC:
> +		rss->sync = synchronize_rcu_bh;
> +		rss->call = call_rcu_bh;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> +	bool need_wait, need_sync;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +	need_wait = rss->gp_count++;
> +	need_sync = rss->gp_state == GP_IDLE;

I suggest that "need_wait = rss->gp_state == GP_PENDING;"



> +	if (need_sync)
> +		rss->gp_state = GP_PENDING;
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +
> +	BUG_ON(need_wait && need_sync);
> +
> +	if (need_sync) {
> +		rss->sync();
> +		rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
> +		wake_up_all(&rss->gp_wait);
> +	} else if (need_wait) {
> +		wait_event(rss->gp_wait, rss->gp_state == GP_PASSED);

memory_barrier is required here in case rss->gp_state is read without rss_lock held.

CPU1				CPU2				CPU3
								rcu_read_lock()
								rcu_sync_is_idle()
rcu_sync_enter()
  rss->sync()			rcu_sync_enter()
				/* XXXX */
								rcu_read_unlock()
  rss->sync() returns
  rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
				  wait_event()(fastpath)
				/* code here maybe run on XXX by CPU reorder */
				


> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Possible when there's a pending CB from a rcu_sync_exit().
> +		 * Nobody has yet been allowed the 'fast' path and thus we can
> +		 * avoid doing any sync(). The callback will get 'dropped'.
> +		 */
> +		BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);

memory_barrier is required here like above.


> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +{
> +	struct rcu_sync_struct *rss =
> +		container_of(rcu, struct rcu_sync_struct, cb_head);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +
> +	BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
> +	BUG_ON(rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> +	if (rss->gp_count) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A new rcu_sync_begin() has happened; drop the callback.
> +		 */
> +		rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> +	} else if (rss->cb_state == CB_REPLAY) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A new rcu_sync_exit() has happened; requeue the callback
> +		 * to catch a later GP.
> +		 */
> +		rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> +		rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * We're at least a GP after rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody will now

s/eveybody/everybody/



Please add
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thanks,
Lai

> +		 * have observed the write side critical section. Let 'em rip!.
> +		 */
> +		rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
> +		rss->gp_state = GP_IDLE;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
> +{
> +	spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +	if (!--rss->gp_count) {
> +		if (rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE) {
> +			rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
> +			rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
> +		} else if (rss->cb_state == CB_PENDING) {
> +			rss->cb_state = CB_REPLAY;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
> +}
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-08 10:25 [PATCH 0/6] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] hotplug: Optimize {get,put}_online_cpus() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 15:08   ` Rik van Riel
2013-10-10  5:47   ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10 11:06     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-10 14:55       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 20:40   ` Jonathan Corbet
2013-10-09 19:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17  2:56   ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-10-17 10:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-10-08 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] hotplug: Optimize cpu_hotplug_{begin,done}() using rcu_sync Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 16:28   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 10:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 16:30   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-17  2:07   ` Lai Jiangshan
     [not found]     ` <20131017154228.GL4553@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2013-10-18  1:23       ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-10-18 12:10         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-20 16:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 10:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 16:30   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 10:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-08 16:32   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-08 15:27 ` [PATCH 0/6] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking -v2 Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-08 15:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10  5:50 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10  6:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  6:34     ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10  7:27       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10  7:33         ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10  7:45           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 12:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 14:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 15:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 15:36         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-10 16:50         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 17:13           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-10 17:35             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 18:35             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 15:26       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-10 16:00         ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10 16:36           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-10 16:43             ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10 16:53               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 17:13                 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-10 17:48                   ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-10 18:10                     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-10 18:43                       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-10 18:50                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 19:15                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-10 19:00                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-10 18:46                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 18:34                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 18:49                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-10 19:04                         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-10 19:16                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-10 19:34                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 19:34                             ` Steven Rostedt
2013-10-11  6:09                             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-11 12:38                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-11 18:25                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-11 20:48                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-12 17:06                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-14  9:05                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-14  9:23                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-15  1:01                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-17 16:49                           ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove get_online_cpus() usage tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-10 17:39                 ` [PATCH 0/6] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking -v2 Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-10 16:52           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-10 17:44             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-10 16:54           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-10-10 19:04             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-10-10 18:52         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525F51DF.4080809@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).