From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, imirkin@alum.mit.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
robdclark@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 3.12] mutex: Avoid gcc version dependent __builtin_constant_p() usage.
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:54:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525FC1DD.4030205@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131017105243.GM2675@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
op 17-10-13 12:52, Peter Zijlstra schreef:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:45:29PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> Commit 040a0a37 "mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks" used
>> "!__builtin_constant_p(p == NULL)" but gcc 3.x cannot handle such expression
>> correctly, leading to boot failure when built with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y.
> So I completely forgot all about this, but wouldn't something like:
>
> !(__builtin_constant_p(p) && p == NULL)
>
> Not also work and generate the same code?
>
See earlier discussion. It was already answered why that was undesirable. ;)
~Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-17 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 10:45 [PATCH for 3.12] mutex: Avoid gcc version dependent __builtin_constant_p() usage Tetsuo Handa
2013-10-17 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 10:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2013-10-17 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-18 12:51 ` [PATCH for 3.12] mutex: Avoid gcc version dependent__builtin_constant_p() usage Tetsuo Handa
2013-10-18 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-18 15:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-10-30 13:14 ` [PATCH 3.11-stable] mutex: Avoid gcc version dependent __builtin_constant_p() usage Tetsuo Handa
2013-10-20 19:31 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525FC1DD.4030205@canonical.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=imirkin@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox