public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alarmtimer: return EINVAL instead of ENOTSUPP if rtcdev doesn't exist
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:05:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <526018C6.5070604@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381786396-1818-1-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>

On 10/14/2013 02:33 PM, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Fedora Ruby maintainer reported latest Ruby doesn't work on Fedora Rawhide
> on ARM. (http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9008)
>
> Because of, commit 1c6b39ad3f (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no
> RTC device is present) intruduced to return ENOTSUPP when
> clock_get{time,res} can't find a RTC device. However it is incorrect.
>
> Posix and Linux man pages agree that clock_gettime and clock_getres
> should return EINVAL if clk_id argument is invalid. This is significant
> different from timer_create API.
>
> This patch fixes it.

Hrm... So I feel like there is a difference here. The clockid for
CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM and CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM are both valid.

Its just that they're not supported on this specific hardware because it
apparently lacks a RTC that has told the system it can be used as a
wakeup device (Its actually quite likely on the hardware that the RTC
can be a wakeup device, but that the driver is probably setting the
wakeup flag after the RTC registered - so there is probably a driver bug
here too).

So I feel like in this case EINVAL isn't quite right.  I'll admit it is
somewhat new behavior, because we haven't had any clockids before that
were dependent on the particular hardware, they either existed in a
kernel verison or didn't.

Would updating the manpage be a better route?

thanks
-john



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-14 21:33 [PATCH] alarmtimer: return EINVAL instead of ENOTSUPP if rtcdev doesn't exist kosaki.motohiro
2013-10-17 17:05 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-10-18  1:12   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-10-18 22:39     ` John Stultz
2013-10-18 23:12       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-10-18 23:29         ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=526018C6.5070604@linaro.org \
    --to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox