From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, kgene.kim@samsung.com, mturquette@linaro.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
s.nawrocki@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
Mateusz Krawczuk <m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.abraham@linaro.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
t.stanislaws@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, ben-linux@fluff.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:51:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5264425E.4040301@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1816869.ggMDlA1qNY@flatron>
On 10/20/13 01:03, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael,
>
> On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:
>> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation
>> (using common clk framework).
>>
>> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and board
>> files.
>>
>> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni and
>> aquila
>> boards using board file.
>>
>> Since v4:
>> Corrected mux flags for finpll.
>>
>> Since v3:
>>
>> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll
>> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents.
>>
>>
>> Mateusz Krawczuk (3):
>> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210
>> Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF
>> ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework
>>
>> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt | 75 +++
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 9 +
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 4 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c | 17 +
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h | 10 +
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 3 +
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c | 673
>> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
>> | 6 +-
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h | 224 +++++++
>> 12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c
>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h
>
> I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on
> the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks?
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
I agree.
Mike, how do you think the common clk stuff for s5pv210?
- Kukjin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-20 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 12:50 [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210 Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 13:58 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-09-24 14:26 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework Mateusz Krawczuk
2013-09-24 13:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Tomasz Figa
2013-10-19 16:03 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-20 20:51 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2013-10-21 12:16 ` Mike Turquette
2013-10-29 11:42 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-29 15:46 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5264425E.4040301@samsung.com \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=t.stanislaws@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox