* [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
@ 2013-10-21 7:24 Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 2:45 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 3:49 ` Gao feng
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Zheng @ 2013-10-21 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kim; +Cc: f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
Introduce the unfailed version of kmem_cache_alloc named f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc
to hide the retry routine and make the code a bit cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 13 +++++++++++++
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 8 ++------
fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 +-----
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 8d16071..6fb484c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -226,12 +226,8 @@ void add_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
break;
orphan = NULL;
}
-retry:
- new = kmem_cache_alloc(orphan_entry_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!new) {
- cond_resched();
- goto retry;
- }
+
+ new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(orphan_entry_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
new->ino = ino;
/* add new_oentry into list which is sorted by inode number */
@@ -484,12 +480,8 @@ void set_dirty_dir_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
return;
-retry:
- new = kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!new) {
- cond_resched();
- goto retry;
- }
+
+ new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
new->inode = inode;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
@@ -506,13 +498,9 @@ retry:
void add_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb);
- struct dir_inode_entry *new;
-retry:
- new = kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!new) {
- cond_resched();
- goto retry;
- }
+ struct dir_inode_entry *new =
+ f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
+
new->inode = inode;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 171c52f..fa9ad03 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -787,6 +787,19 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *f2fs_kmem_cache_create(const char *name,
return kmem_cache_create(name, size, 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, ctor);
}
+static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
+ gfp_t flags)
+{
+ void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
+retry:
+ if (!entry) {
+ cond_resched();
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ return entry;
+}
+
#define RAW_IS_INODE(p) ((p)->footer.nid == (p)->footer.ino)
static inline bool IS_INODE(struct page *page)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index fbad968..7914b92 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -361,12 +361,8 @@ static void add_gc_inode(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *ilist)
iput(inode);
return;
}
-repeat:
- new_ie = kmem_cache_alloc(winode_slab, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!new_ie) {
- cond_resched();
- goto repeat;
- }
+
+ new_ie = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(winode_slab, GFP_NOFS);
new_ie->inode = inode;
list_add_tail(&new_ie->list, ilist);
}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index ef80f79..fe3cf8e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1308,11 +1308,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
if (allocated)
return 0;
retry:
- i = kmem_cache_alloc(free_nid_slab, GFP_NOFS);
- if (!i) {
- cond_resched();
- goto retry;
- }
+ i = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(free_nid_slab, GFP_NOFS);
i->nid = nid;
i->state = NID_NEW;
--
1.7.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-21 7:24 [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation Gu Zheng
@ 2013-10-22 2:45 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 5:17 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 3:49 ` Gao feng
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Haicheng Li @ 2013-10-22 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Zheng; +Cc: Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
Looks neat.
Reviewed-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:24:55PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> Introduce the unfailed version of kmem_cache_alloc named f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc
> to hide the retry routine and make the code a bit cleaner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 8 ++------
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 +-----
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 8d16071..6fb484c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -226,12 +226,8 @@ void add_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> break;
> orphan = NULL;
> }
> -retry:
> - new = kmem_cache_alloc(orphan_entry_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
> - if (!new) {
> - cond_resched();
> - goto retry;
> - }
> +
> + new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(orphan_entry_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
> new->ino = ino;
>
> /* add new_oentry into list which is sorted by inode number */
> @@ -484,12 +480,8 @@ void set_dirty_dir_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
>
> if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> return;
> -retry:
> - new = kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> - if (!new) {
> - cond_resched();
> - goto retry;
> - }
> +
> + new = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> new->inode = inode;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
>
> @@ -506,13 +498,9 @@ retry:
> void add_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb);
> - struct dir_inode_entry *new;
> -retry:
> - new = kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> - if (!new) {
> - cond_resched();
> - goto retry;
> - }
> + struct dir_inode_entry *new =
> + f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(inode_entry_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> +
> new->inode = inode;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 171c52f..fa9ad03 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -787,6 +787,19 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *f2fs_kmem_cache_create(const char *name,
> return kmem_cache_create(name, size, 0, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, ctor);
> }
>
> +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> + gfp_t flags)
> +{
> + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
> +retry:
> + if (!entry) {
> + cond_resched();
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + return entry;
> +}
> +
> #define RAW_IS_INODE(p) ((p)->footer.nid == (p)->footer.ino)
>
> static inline bool IS_INODE(struct page *page)
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index fbad968..7914b92 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -361,12 +361,8 @@ static void add_gc_inode(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *ilist)
> iput(inode);
> return;
> }
> -repeat:
> - new_ie = kmem_cache_alloc(winode_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> - if (!new_ie) {
> - cond_resched();
> - goto repeat;
> - }
> +
> + new_ie = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(winode_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> new_ie->inode = inode;
> list_add_tail(&new_ie->list, ilist);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index ef80f79..fe3cf8e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1308,11 +1308,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
> if (allocated)
> return 0;
> retry:
> - i = kmem_cache_alloc(free_nid_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> - if (!i) {
> - cond_resched();
> - goto retry;
> - }
> + i = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(free_nid_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> i->nid = nid;
> i->state = NID_NEW;
>
> --
> 1.7.7
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-21 7:24 [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 2:45 ` Haicheng Li
@ 2013-10-22 3:49 ` Gao feng
2013-10-22 5:16 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 5:30 ` Gu Zheng
1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gao feng @ 2013-10-22 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Zheng; +Cc: Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On 10/21/2013 03:24 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
> +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> + gfp_t flags)
> +{
> + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
> +retry:
retry after kmem_cache_alloc?
> + if (!entry) {
> + cond_resched();
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + return entry;
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-22 3:49 ` Gao feng
@ 2013-10-22 5:16 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 5:34 ` Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 5:30 ` Gu Zheng
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Haicheng Li @ 2013-10-22 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gao feng; +Cc: Gu Zheng, Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:49:58AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 03:24 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
> > +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> > + gfp_t flags)
> > +{
> > + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
> > +retry:
>
> retry after kmem_cache_alloc?
Good catch.
Sorry for the carelessness in my previous review.
Besides this, I also found another issue as below:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:24:55PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index ef80f79..fe3cf8e 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1308,11 +1308,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
> > if (allocated)
> > return 0;
> > retry:
-retry?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-22 2:45 ` Haicheng Li
@ 2013-10-22 5:17 ` Haicheng Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Haicheng Li @ 2013-10-22 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Zheng; +Cc: Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:45:48AM +0800, Haicheng Li wrote:
> Looks neat.
>
> Reviewed-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
pls. ignore this mail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-22 3:49 ` Gao feng
2013-10-22 5:16 ` Haicheng Li
@ 2013-10-22 5:30 ` Gu Zheng
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Zheng @ 2013-10-22 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gao feng; +Cc: Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On 10/22/2013 11:49 AM, Gao feng wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 03:24 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
>> +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
>> + gfp_t flags)
>> +{
>> + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
>> +retry:
>
> retry after kmem_cache_alloc?
Oh~, stupid mistake, thanks for your reminder.:)
>
>> + if (!entry) {
>> + cond_resched();
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return entry;
>> +}
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-22 5:16 ` Haicheng Li
@ 2013-10-22 5:34 ` Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 6:15 ` Haicheng Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Zheng @ 2013-10-22 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haicheng Li; +Cc: Gao feng, Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On 10/22/2013 01:16 PM, Haicheng Li wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:49:58AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> On 10/21/2013 03:24 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>> +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
>>> + gfp_t flags)
>>> +{
>>> + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
>>> +retry:
>>
>> retry after kmem_cache_alloc?
>
> Good catch.
>
> Sorry for the carelessness in my previous review.
> Besides this, I also found another issue as below:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:24:55PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> index ef80f79..fe3cf8e 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> @@ -1308,11 +1308,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
>>> if (allocated)
>>> return 0;
>>> retry:
> -retry?
Can be removed here, this tag still used by front goto jumping. But it
seems that we need to use another suitable name rather than "retry".
Regards,
Gu
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-22 5:34 ` Gu Zheng
@ 2013-10-22 6:15 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 6:26 ` Gu Zheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Haicheng Li @ 2013-10-22 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gu Zheng; +Cc: Gao feng, Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:34:26PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 01:16 PM, Haicheng Li wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:49:58AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> >> On 10/21/2013 03:24 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
> >>> +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> >>> + gfp_t flags)
> >>> +{
> >>> + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
> >>> +retry:
> >>
> >> retry after kmem_cache_alloc?
> >
> > Good catch.
> >
> > Sorry for the carelessness in my previous review.
> > Besides this, I also found another issue as below:
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:24:55PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>> index ef80f79..fe3cf8e 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>> @@ -1308,11 +1308,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
> >>> if (allocated)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> retry:
> > -retry?
>
> Can be removed here, this tag still used by front goto jumping. But it
> seems that we need to use another suitable name rather than "retry".
how about like this?
---
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index fe3cf8e..4fa3fd5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1296,18 +1296,17 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
if (nid == 0)
return 0;
- if (!build)
- goto retry;
+ if (build) {
+ /* do not add allocated nids */
+ read_lock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
+ ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
+ if (ne && nat_get_blkaddr(ne) != NULL_ADDR)
+ allocated = true;
+ read_unlock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
+ if (allocated)
+ return 0;
+ }
- /* do not add allocated nids */
- read_lock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
- ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
- if (ne && nat_get_blkaddr(ne) != NULL_ADDR)
- allocated = true;
- read_unlock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
- if (allocated)
- return 0;
-retry:
i = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(free_nid_slab, GFP_NOFS);
i->nid = nid;
i->state = NID_NEW;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation
2013-10-22 6:15 ` Haicheng Li
@ 2013-10-22 6:26 ` Gu Zheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gu Zheng @ 2013-10-22 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Haicheng Li; +Cc: Gao feng, Kim, f2fs, fsdevel, linux-kernel
On 10/22/2013 02:15 PM, Haicheng Li wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:34:26PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>> On 10/22/2013 01:16 PM, Haicheng Li wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:49:58AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>>>> On 10/21/2013 03:24 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>>>> +static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
>>>>> + gfp_t flags)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + void *entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
>>>>> +retry:
>>>>
>>>> retry after kmem_cache_alloc?
>>>
>>> Good catch.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the carelessness in my previous review.
>>> Besides this, I also found another issue as below:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:24:55PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>> index ef80f79..fe3cf8e 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>> @@ -1308,11 +1308,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
>>>>> if (allocated)
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> retry:
>>> -retry?
>>
>> Can be removed here, this tag still used by front goto jumping. But it
>> seems that we need to use another suitable name rather than "retry".
>
> how about like this?
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index fe3cf8e..4fa3fd5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1296,18 +1296,17 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, nid_t nid, bool build)
> if (nid == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!build)
> - goto retry;
> + if (build) {
> + /* do not add allocated nids */
> + read_lock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> + ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
> + if (ne && nat_get_blkaddr(ne) != NULL_ADDR)
> + allocated = true;
> + read_unlock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> + if (allocated)
> + return 0;
> + }
Good, it's more neat, I'll take this, thanks.:)
Regards,
Gu
>
> - /* do not add allocated nids */
> - read_lock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> - ne = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, nid);
> - if (ne && nat_get_blkaddr(ne) != NULL_ADDR)
> - allocated = true;
> - read_unlock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> - if (allocated)
> - return 0;
> -retry:
> i = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(free_nid_slab, GFP_NOFS);
> i->nid = nid;
> i->state = NID_NEW;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-22 6:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-21 7:24 [PATCH] f2fs: introduce f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc to hide the unfailed kmem cache allocation Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 2:45 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 5:17 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 3:49 ` Gao feng
2013-10-22 5:16 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 5:34 ` Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 6:15 ` Haicheng Li
2013-10-22 6:26 ` Gu Zheng
2013-10-22 5:30 ` Gu Zheng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox