From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: add option to limit callchain stack scan to increase speed
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:12:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5266CE16.8080507@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871u3dkwmu.fsf@danjae.aot.lge.com>
On 10/22/2013 02:07 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:03:36 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> v2->v3:
>> - Fix the commit log in the second patch which causes "git am" to fail.
>> - Remove the 1st patch in v2 as the problem will be fixed by another
>> patch from Arnaldo.
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - Include a compilation fix patch and a code streamlining patch
>> into the patch set.
>> - Use the __stringify() macro in stringify.h instead of adding a
>> duplicate macro.
>> - Add the --max-stack option to perf-top as well.
>>
>> This perf patch set contains the following changes:
>>
>> Patch 1 - Streamline the append_chain() function to make it run a bit
>> faster.
>> Patch 2 - Add a --max-stack option to perf-report to speed up its
>> processing at the expense of less backtrace information
>> available.
>> Patch 3 - Add a similar --max-stack option to perf-top.
> At first, thank you for tackling this. It was really a problem using
> callchain on non trivial perf session. But there's another effort to
> address this problem in other direction. You might want to see below
> link [1]. Patch 1/8 does the thing and it seems Arnaldo already merged
> it into his tree.
Thank for letting me aware of your patch to address the perf-report
problem. As I am working on resolving scalability problem in large NUMA
machines, I often encounters large perf.data files that took more than
1/2 hour for perf-report to produce anything. It is kind of frustrating
to wait so long. I like the performance improvement in your patch 1/8,
coupled with the max-stack option, it can really speed thing up.
-Longman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-22 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 15:03 [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: add option to limit callchain stack scan to increase speed Waiman Long
2013-10-21 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf: streamline append_chain() function Waiman Long
2013-10-21 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf-report: add --max-stack option to limit callchain stack scan Waiman Long
2013-10-21 15:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf-top: " Waiman Long
2013-10-22 18:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: add option to limit callchain stack scan to increase speed Namhyung Kim
2013-10-22 19:12 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5266CE16.8080507@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox