From: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar>, <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
<fweisbec@gmail.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE"
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:10:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F353E.8040607@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwls7ouf.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
On 10/28/13 8:11 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hey Namhyung:
>>
>> Also, what's the reasoning for --cumulate not being an option under
>> perf record -g ..,<order>?
>
> Sorry, I cannot understand you. The 'perf record' just saves sample
> data (and callchains) from the ring-buffer. All the processing happens
> in 'perf report'. I can't see what you expect from the 'perf record
> --cumulate'. Am I missing something?
Yes - I meant to say perf report -g :)
> -g [type,min[,limit],order]
Specifically, along with callee, caller, we could have a third option.
Or we could have a new type (graph, fractal, cumulative).
>> Given that there are clear use cases in production involving complex
>> callgraphs, I'm for getting this support in first and then reconciling
>> the differences with perf record -b later.
>
> I think what Frederic said is that the code de-duplication of 'perf
> report' side. The branch stack and --cumulate are different - branch
> stack concentrates on the branch itself but --cumulate uses callchains
> to find parents and give some credit to them as side information.
Me too. I brought it up with Stephane at some point in the last year or
so and there wasn't an obvious way to de-duplicate because of these
differences.
-Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-25 15:07 State of "perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE" Rodrigo Campos
2013-10-28 5:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-28 8:42 ` Rodrigo Campos
2013-10-28 9:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-28 9:29 ` Rodrigo Campos
2013-10-28 16:43 ` Arun Sharma
2013-10-29 3:11 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-29 4:10 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2013-10-29 5:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-29 8:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-10-28 8:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526F353E.8040607@fb.com \
--to=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox