From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, youquan.song@intel.com, riel@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:29:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F8E21.1030702@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131029095135.GH4126@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 10/29/2013 05:51 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:48:56PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> In some cases, nohz enable status needs to be checked. E.G, in RCU and cpufreq
>> ondemand governor. So add tick_nohz_check() to return tick_nohz_enabled value
>> And use tick_nohz_check() instead of referencing tick_nohz_enabled in the rcutree_plugin.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
>
> NACK on the rcutree change unless you put the ACCESS_ONCE() in.
>
> Or is there some reason that ACCESS_ONCE() is not needed? If so, what
> is that reason?
Hi Paul:
Thanks for review. When I change this code, I find the tick_nohz_enabled
isn't changed dynamically. It's only changed during parsing kernel
params when "nohz=off/on" is set. Except this, it will not be changed.
So I ignored ACCESS_ONCE(). If necessary, I can add it back.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>> ---
>> include/linux/tick.h | 2 ++
>> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 4 +---
>> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
>> index 5128d33..a9c5374 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
>> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static inline int tick_nohz_tick_stopped(void)
>> extern void tick_nohz_idle_enter(void);
>> extern void tick_nohz_idle_exit(void);
>> extern void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void);
>> +extern int tick_nohz_check(void);
>> extern ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void);
>> extern u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
>> extern u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time);
>> @@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void)
>>
>> return len;
>> }
>> +static inline int tick_nohz_check(void) { return 0; }
>> static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
>> static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
>> # endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
>> index 130c97b..af167ec 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
>> @@ -1627,8 +1627,6 @@ module_param(rcu_idle_gp_delay, int, 0644);
>> static int rcu_idle_lazy_gp_delay = RCU_IDLE_LAZY_GP_DELAY;
>> module_param(rcu_idle_lazy_gp_delay, int, 0644);
>>
>> -extern int tick_nohz_enabled;
>> -
>> /*
>> * Try to advance callbacks for all flavors of RCU on the current CPU.
>> * Afterwards, if there are any callbacks ready for immediate invocation,
>> @@ -1718,7 +1716,7 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
>> int tne;
>>
>> /* Handle nohz enablement switches conservatively. */
>> - tne = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_nohz_enabled);
>> + tne = tick_nohz_check();
>> if (tne != rdtp->tick_nohz_enabled_snap) {
>> if (rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu, NULL))
>> invoke_rcu_core(); /* force nohz to see update. */
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> index 3612fc7..d381a22 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
>> @@ -361,7 +361,13 @@ void __init tick_nohz_init(void)
>> /*
>> * NO HZ enabled ?
>> */
>> -int tick_nohz_enabled __read_mostly = 1;
>> +static int tick_nohz_enabled __read_mostly = 1;
>> +
>> +int tick_nohz_check(void)
>> +{
>> + return tick_nohz_enabled;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_check);
>>
>> /*
>> * Enable / Disable tickless mode
>> --
>> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-29 8:48 [PATCH 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status Lan Tianyu
2013-10-29 8:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] Cpufreq/gov: use tick_nohz_check() to check idle micro accouting support Lan Tianyu
2013-10-29 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status Paul E. McKenney
2013-10-29 10:29 ` Lan Tianyu [this message]
2013-11-04 3:13 ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-04 9:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-05 0:42 ` Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15 8:35 ` [PATCH V2 " Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15 8:35 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] Cpufreq/gov: use tick_nohz_check() to check idle micro accouting support Lan Tianyu
2013-11-15 10:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-15 10:35 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] Tick: Introduce tick_nohz_check() to check nohz enable status Viresh Kumar
2013-11-15 11:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526F8E21.1030702@intel.com \
--to=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox