Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: add Intel Mid SSP driver

Felipe Balbi
2013-10-29T18:30:52Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14815 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:05:49AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-intel-mid-ssp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-intel-mid-ssp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b3b9fe8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-intel-mid-ssp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1506 @@
> +/*
> + * spi-intel-mid-ssp.c
> + * This driver supports Bulverde SSP core used on Intel MID platforms
> + * It supports SSP of Moorestown & Medfield platforms and handles clock
> + * slave & master modes.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2013, Intel Corporation.
> + * Contacts: Ning Li <ning.li@intel.com>
> + * David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
> + * this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
> + * 51 Franklin St - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Note:
> + *
> + * Supports DMA and non-interrupt polled transfers.
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/highmem.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/intel_mid_dma.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <asm/intel-mid.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> +#include <linux/spi/intel_mid_ssp_spi.h>
> +
> +#define DRIVER_NAME "intel_mid_ssp_spi_unified"
> +
> +static int ssp_timing_wr;

this will prevent multiple instances of the same driver.

> +#ifdef DUMP_RX
> +static void dump_trailer(const struct device *dev, char *buf, int len, int sz)
> +{
> + int tlen1 = (len < sz ? len : sz);
> + int tlen2 = ((len - sz) > sz) ? sz : (len - sz);
> + unsigned char *p;
> + static char msg[MAX_SPI_TRANSFER_SIZE];
> +
> + memset(msg, '\0', sizeof(msg));
> + p = buf;
> + while (p < buf + tlen1)
> + sprintf(msg, "%s%02x", msg, (unsigned int)*p++);
> +
> + if (tlen2 > 0) {
> + sprintf(msg, "%s .....", msg);
> + p = (buf+len) - tlen2;
> + while (p < buf + len)
> + sprintf(msg, "%s%02x", msg, (unsigned int)*p++);
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "DUMP: %p[0:%d ... %d:%d]:%s", buf, tlen1 - 1,
> + len-tlen2, len - 1, msg);
> +}
> +#endif

either move this to debugfs or stub the function out ifndef DUMP_RX,
then you don't need the ifdefs when calling it.

> +static inline u8 ssp_cfg_get_mode(u8 ssp_cfg)
> +{
> + if (intel_mid_identify_cpu() == INTEL_MID_CPU_CHIP_TANGIER)

instead, couldn't you use driver data to pass some flags to the driver ?
I can't see intel_mid_identify_cpu and having drivers depend on
arch-specific code is usually a bad practice.

> + return (ssp_cfg) & 0x03;
> + else

else isn't needed here

> +static inline u32 is_tx_fifo_empty(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + u32 sssr;

blank line here would aid readability

> + sssr = read_SSSR(sspc->ioaddr);
> + if ((sssr & SSSR_TFL_MASK) || (sssr & SSSR_TNF) == 0)
> + return 0;
> + else

else isn't necessary

> +static inline u32 is_rx_fifo_empty(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + return ((read_SSSR(sspc->ioaddr) & SSSR_RNE) == 0);

you don't need the outter parenthesis here, GCC should've warned you,
even.

> +static inline void disable_interface(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line here

> + write_SSCR0(read_SSCR0(reg) & ~SSCR0_SSE, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void disable_triggers(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

and here...

> + write_SSCR1(read_SSCR1(reg) & ~sspc->cr1_sig, reg);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void flush(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;
> + u32 i = 0;
> +
> + /* If the transmit fifo is not empty, reset the interface. */
> + if (!is_tx_fifo_empty(sspc)) {
> + dev_err(&sspc->pdev->dev, "TX FIFO not empty. Reset of SPI IF");
> + disable_interface(sspc);
> + return;
> + }

not so sure, if the transmit fifo isn't empty and you reset it, you
could end up corrupting data which is about to be shifted into the wire,
couldn't you ?

Is this a case which would *really* happen in normal conditions ? If so,
why ?

> + dev_dbg(&sspc->pdev->dev, " SSSR=%x\r\n", read_SSSR(reg));
> + while (!is_rx_fifo_empty(sspc) && (i < SPI_FIFO_SIZE + 1)) {
> + read_SSDR(reg);
> + i++;
> + }
> + WARN(i > 0, "%d words flush occured\n", i);

similarly, you could be ignoring data you *should* indeed be handling.

> +
> + return;

return statement is unnecessary.

> +static int null_writer(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)

looks like these two functions (null_\(writer\|reader\)) need some
documentation. Why do they exist ?

> +static int u8_writer(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line

> + if (((read_SSSR(reg) & SSSR_TFL_MASK) == SSSR_TFL_MASK)
> + || (sspc->tx == sspc->tx_end))
> + return 0;
> +
> + write_SSDR(*(u8 *)(sspc->tx), reg);
> + ++sspc->tx;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int u8_reader(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line

> + while ((read_SSSR(reg) & SSSR_RNE)
> + && (sspc->rx < sspc->rx_end)) {
> + *(u8 *)(sspc->rx) = read_SSDR(reg);
> + ++sspc->rx;
> + }
> +
> + return sspc->rx == sspc->rx_end;
> +}
> +
> +static int u16_writer(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line

> + if (((read_SSSR(reg) & SSSR_TFL_MASK) == SSSR_TFL_MASK)

the extra comparisson here is superfluous.

> + || (sspc->tx == sspc->tx_end))
> + return 0;
> +
> + write_SSDR(*(u16 *)(sspc->tx), reg);
> + sspc->tx += 2;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int u16_reader(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line

> + while ((read_SSSR(reg) & SSSR_RNE) && (sspc->rx < sspc->rx_end)) {
> + *(u16 *)(sspc->rx) = read_SSDR(reg);
> + sspc->rx += 2;
> + }
> +
> + return sspc->rx == sspc->rx_end;
> +}
> +
> +static int u32_writer(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line

> + if (((read_SSSR(reg) & SSSR_TFL_MASK) == SSSR_TFL_MASK)

the extra comparisson here is superfluous.

> + || (sspc->tx == sspc->tx_end))
> + return 0;
> +
> + write_SSDR(*(u32 *)(sspc->tx), reg);
> + sspc->tx += 4;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int u32_reader(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;

blank line

> + while ((read_SSSR(reg) & SSSR_RNE) && (sspc->rx < sspc->rx_end)) {
> + *(u32 *)(sspc->rx) = read_SSDR(reg);
> + sspc->rx += 4;
> + }
> +
> + return sspc->rx == sspc->rx_end;
> +}
> +
> +static bool chan_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> +{
> + struct ssp_drv_context *sspc = param;
> +
> + if (sspc->dmac1 && chan->device->dev == &sspc->dmac1->dev)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * unmap_dma_buffers() - Unmap the DMA buffers used during the last transfer.
> + * @sspc: Pointer to the private driver context
> + */
> +static void unmap_dma_buffers(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &sspc->pdev->dev;
> +
> + if (!sspc->dma_mapped)
> + return;

blank line

> + dma_unmap_single(dev, sspc->rx_dma, sspc->len, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(dev, sspc->tx_dma, sspc->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + sspc->dma_mapped = 0;

you shouldn't need this dma_mapped flag here...

> +static void ssp_spi_dma_done(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct callback_param *cb_param = (struct callback_param *)arg;
> + struct ssp_drv_context *sspc = cb_param->drv_context;
> + struct device *dev = &sspc->pdev->dev;
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;
> +
> + if (cb_param->direction == TX_DIRECTION)
> + sspc->txdma_done = 1;
> + else
> + sspc->rxdma_done = 1;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "DMA callback for direction %d [RX done:%d] [TX done:%d]\n",
> + cb_param->direction, sspc->rxdma_done,
> + sspc->txdma_done);
> +
> + if (sspc->txdma_done && sspc->rxdma_done) {
> + /* Clear Status Register */
> + write_SSSR(sspc->clear_sr, reg);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "DMA done\n");
> + /* Disable Triggers to DMA or to CPU*/
> + disable_triggers(sspc);
> + unmap_dma_buffers(sspc);
> +
> + queue_work(sspc->dma_wq, &sspc->complete_work);

I fail to see the need for this workstruct, why can't you call
complete() directly ?

> +static irqreturn_t ssp_int(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct ssp_drv_context *sspc = dev_id;
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;
> + struct device *dev = &sspc->pdev->dev;
> + u32 status = read_SSSR(reg);
> +
> + /* It should never be our interrupt since SSP will */
> + /* only trigs interrupt for under/over run. */

wrong comment style

> + if (likely(!(status & sspc->mask_sr)))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + if (status & SSSR_ROR || status & SSSR_TUR) {
> + dev_err(dev, "--- SPI ROR or TUR occurred : SSSR=%x\n", status);
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + if (status & SSSR_ROR)
> + dev_err(dev, "we have Overrun\n");
> + if (status & SSSR_TUR)
> + dev_err(dev, "we have Underrun\n");
> + }

I would split these two caes here:

if (status & ROR)
dev_WARN(dev, "Overrun\n");

if (status & TUR)
dev_WARN(dev, "Underrun\n");

no need for nested ifs.

> +static void poll_transfer(unsigned long data)
> +{
> + struct ssp_drv_context *sspc = (void *)data;
> +
> + if (sspc->tx) {
> + while (sspc->tx != sspc->tx_end) {
> + if (ssp_timing_wr) {
> + int timeout = 100;
> + /* It is used as debug UART on Tangier. Since
> + baud rate = 115200, it needs at least 312us
> + for one word transferring. Becuase of silicon
> + issue, it MUST check SFIFOL here instead of
> + TNF. It is the workaround for A0 stepping*/

wrong comment style.

> + while (--timeout &&
> + ((read_SFIFOL(sspc->ioaddr)) & 0xFFFF))
> + udelay(10);
> + }
> + sspc->write(sspc);
> + sspc->read(sspc);
> + }
> + }

you can make this look sligthly better if you:

if (!sspc->tx)
bail();

while (sspc->tx != sspc->tx_end) {
if (sspc->timing_wr) {
int timeout = 100;

....
}
}

it'll decrease one indentation level.

> +static void start_bitbanging(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)

I would prefix with ssp_

> +static int handle_message(struct ssp_drv_context *sspc)
> +{
> + struct chip_data *chip = NULL;
> + struct spi_transfer *transfer = NULL;
> + void *reg = sspc->ioaddr;
> + u32 cr1;
> + struct device *dev = &sspc->pdev->dev;
> + struct spi_message *msg = sspc->cur_msg;
> +
> + chip = spi_get_ctldata(msg->spi);
> +
> + /* We handle only one transfer message since the protocol module has to
> + control the out of band signaling. */

wrong comment style.

> + transfer = list_entry(msg->transfers.next, struct spi_transfer,
> + transfer_list);
> +
> + /* Check transfer length */
> + if (unlikely((transfer->len > MAX_SPI_TRANSFER_SIZE) ||
> + (transfer->len == 0))) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "transfer length null or greater than %d\n",
> + MAX_SPI_TRANSFER_SIZE);
> + dev_warn(dev, "length = %d\n", transfer->len);
> + msg->status = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (msg->complete)
> + msg->complete(msg->context);
> + complete(&sspc->msg_done);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Flush any remaining data (in case of failed previous transfer) */
> + flush(sspc);
> +
> + sspc->tx = (void *)transfer->tx_buf;
> + sspc->rx = (void *)transfer->rx_buf;
> + sspc->len = transfer->len;
> + sspc->write = chip->write;
> + sspc->read = chip->read;
> +
> + if (likely(chip->dma_enabled)) {
> + sspc->dma_mapped = map_dma_buffers(sspc);
> + if (unlikely(!sspc->dma_mapped))
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + sspc->write = sspc->tx ? chip->write : null_writer;
> + sspc->read = sspc->rx ? chip->read : null_reader;
> + }
> + sspc->tx_end = sspc->tx + transfer->len;
> + sspc->rx_end = sspc->rx + transfer->len;
> + write_SSSR(sspc->clear_sr, reg);
> +
> + /* setup the CR1 control register */
> + cr1 = chip->cr1 | sspc->cr1_sig;
> +
> + if (likely(sspc->quirks & QUIRKS_DMA_USE_NO_TRAIL)) {
> + /* in case of len smaller than burst size, adjust the RX */
> + /* threshold. All other cases will use the default threshold */
> + /* value. The RX fifo threshold must be aligned with the DMA */
> + /* RX transfer size, which may be limited to a multiple of 4 */
> + /* bytes due to 32bits DDR access. */

wrong comment style

> +static int ssp_spi_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct spi_master *master;
> + struct ssp_drv_context *sspc = 0;
> + int status;
> + u32 iolen = 0;
> + u8 ssp_cfg;
> + int pos;
> + void __iomem *syscfg_ioaddr;
> + unsigned long syscfg;
> +
> + /* Check if the SSP we are probed for has been allocated */
> + /* to operate as SPI. This information is retreived from */
> + /* the field adid of the Vendor-Specific PCI capability */
> + /* which is used as a configuration register. */

wrong comment style

> +static int ssp_spi_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ssp_spi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}

why even add these if they're no-ops ?

> +static int __init ssp_spi_init(void)
> +{
> + return pci_register_driver(&ssp_spi_driver);
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(ssp_spi_init);

does it have to be late ? Can't you just use module_pci_driver()
instead ?

> @@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) Intel 2013
> + *
> + * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.

companies usually don't like this "at your option any later version"
statement. Usually it's GPL2 only...

--
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]